Jump to content

Talk:Thor's Hammer (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thor's Hammer is referred to as a codename for a WW2 nuclear scientist in the X Files, wonder if that is historical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.166.251 (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether the extreme right is going to make it too controversial.--Wiglaf 15:32, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I think calling it controversial is silly. What right does ADL have to claim our cultural/historical heritage racist? Strange people..

This information is the exact same information already contained in the Mjolnir article. There's no reason for this to exist except, perhaps, as a redirect. Looking for comments one way or another. I'll wait a week before replacing. --GaidinBDJ 20:48, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)

I think this article should remain (but I am the one who made it). The reason is that this article can be expanded and it does not deal with the same phenomenon as Mjolnir.--Wiglaf 20:30, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Because this article hasn't seen any development and remains a copy of material at Mjolnir, I'm going to redirect it to that article. --NormanEinstein 21:11, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're wrong. This article can and will be expanded. Why are you so anxious to redirect it?--Wiglaf 21:13, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really anxious to redirect the article, but GaidenDB originally suggested the redirect 6 months ago and the article's status hasn't changed at all since then. I'm not too sure what you had planned for this page, but perhaps you can work it into section of the Mjolnir article since Mjolinr and Thor's Hammer are the same thing. (btw, that's a cute picture of your daugher on your userpage :-) --NormanEinstein 21:35, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :). Well, I understand your point and I am not anxious about reverting your work. This pendant is quite a concept in Scandinavia and when I get around I will probably recreate the article, but more fully fleshed out.--Wiglaf 21:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]