Talk:Erogenous zone

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Erogenous zone article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 60 days

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Female Erogenous Zones

Hi. Is there a visual illustration with sensitivity measures for the female erogenous zones? (I am aware there are ones for males, but I cannot seem to find one for females) Jas9777 (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal Of Image

Image may not be of adults Faisv (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On what basis do you say that? These look like adults to me. Young adults, yes, but not minors. Besides, these are pretty much biological-text type pictures. Peaceray (talk) 01:28, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foreskin shouldn't be included

Reliable sources say differently.

"However, a systematic review (detailed in the next section) of histological correlates of sexual pleasure attributed erogenous sensation to the glans and underside of the shaft, not the foreskin, with the erogenous sensations claimed to arise from the frenulum actually stemming from stimulation of nearby genital corpuscles in the glans and shaft rather than the frenulum itself." An outrageous instance of bias. OntologicalTree (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That source may say otherwise, but anyone that has a foreskin knows that it can be stimulated to produce pleasure, even when not retracted. PokeSpears (talk) 06:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]