Comment: I can't decide on this one. On the one hand, political parties should be documented, regardless of how distasteful their politics. But on the other hand, although the article describes them as "a United Kingdom political party", a quick Google reveals that they have not actually contested any elections, merely announced that they intend to in the future. And the article itself says "the Electoral Commission refused permission for the WNP name", so if they do ever achieve any prominence as a political party it will be under a different name anyway. —Stormie 06:36, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)
Not all political parties exist to stand in elections - on the far left and far right they often don't believe in electoral politics. Secretlondon 12:19, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The article should be kept but edited to reflect all of the foregoing. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:30, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep for now. User:143.117.143.42 added to it and their contrib list shows evidence they know their way around this stuff. If Nick Griffin is involved then definitely keep (though that's not clear from this article). It's a defective article, but documenting the neo-Nazi splinter groups is entirely encyclopaedic IMO - David Gerard 09:48, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete - advert for their views and promotion for their group. - Tεxτurε 19:23, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I disagree that that's a criterion for deletion. Are Neo-Nazi groups encyclopaedic or not? You seem to be saying they aren't. This article doesn't read to me like a promo at all - David Gerard 21:26, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I want to add: I've been trying to fill out Category:Neo-Nazi topics and I'd really rather not lose stuff - David Gerard 20:27, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I'm almost certain this has been listed before. -- Cyrius|✎ 19:33, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I was thinking of White nationalist FAQ, whose deleted revisions have mysteriously disappeared. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:52, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I assume this is the same party? Notable enough for me. Everyking 06:00, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Any fool can form a political party. It takes several fools to make one a legitimate presence on the political landscape. Just another kind of vanity page. Denni☯ 04:29, 2004 Jun 25 (UTC)
No vote. This is a real party, active in various parts of the UK, which is encyclopaedic. The article needs so much work that I'm not going to vote to keep it, but would if it was rewritten. Warofdreams 18:40, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep - its an active politicial party in the UK. Secretlondon 12:18, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
