Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torrentocrazy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. dbenbenn | talk 02:43, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Torrentocrazy

Sounds like a neologism. jni 15:15, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Keep ...but, and this is important... should be renamed to Torrentocracy, as whoever wrote this misspelled the title so it sounds like a psychiatric condition. Under the right spelling, it's a notable technology concept with some 8,000 Google hits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:39, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, aside from the unencyclopedic writing style and mis-spelled article title, content describes a rather generic media consumption model. Wyss 19:25, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete Nonsense JimmyShelter 20:52, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

That's another way of putting it :) Wyss 21:06, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Move to Torrentocracy, and add redirect. 5000+ Google hits. Article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 01:19, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Comment. Further investigation showed that this is also a copyvio from http://torrentocracy.com/ I have reported this on the copyvio page. Given the circumstances (wrong title to begin with), I suggest interested parties do a complete rewrite at Torrentocracy (not in /Temp) and this be deleted after the 5 day VfD lag time runs out. jni 07:17, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep and fix the article title. —RaD Man (talk) 09:54, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Uhh... You want to keep a copyvio? I'm afraid that won't happen, no matter how many keep-votes this gets. jni 15:43, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.