This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Charles Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Charles Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Catholic==
I added the information on his service to the Catholic Church in England, I'll see if I can add more stuff later, though considering the relative un-importance of this article I might forget all together. --Robgea03:41, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Robgea[reply]
File:2ndViscountHalifax.jpg Nominated for Deletion
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
I cannot see why Fox-Davies in Armorial Families (see [1]) shows the arms of Charles Lindley Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax (1839-1934) with an inescutcheon of pretence of Courtenay. Inescutcheons of pretence are used where a man has married a heraldic heiress, that is a woman who is her father's heir and who therefore has no surviving brothers. This was not the case with Lady Agnes Elizabeth Courtenay (1838-1919), the wife of Charles Lindley Wood, 2nd Viscount Halifax (1839-1934) and the daughter of William Reginald Courtenay, 11th Earl of Devon (1807-1888). She did have a surviving brother, namely Edward Baldwin Courtenay, 12th Earl of Devon (1836-1891), who succeeded his father as Earl of Devon. Fox-Davies may have this wrong (he gave the bride's father incorrectly as the "12th Earl"). Sources should not be relied on blindly without an assessment of their correctness. Am I missing something here?(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]