Talk:Carolus Clusius

Untitled

Regarding the latest edit (19 March 2005): though I won't change it, I hesitate to call Clusius a "Belgian botanist." He was born in Arras, which at the time (1526) was part of the Habsburg possessions in the Low Countries. It became part of the Spanish Netherlands when Charles V divided his inheritance between his brother Ferdinand (who succeeded him to the Austrian Habsburg possessions and as Emperor) and his son Philip. Arras is now part of France. At no time was it part of Belgium, a country that came into existence in 1830. It would be more accurate to call him a Walloon botanist, though even that is problematic. What about "Artesian botanist" or "botanist from Arras"? BWOgilvie 22:34, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I agree. The very "Category:Belgian botanists" is bogus. Clusius was an internationalist himself. --Wetman 03:47, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Another comment: I just added a reference to my forthcoming book on Renaissance natural history, not as advertising but as a reliable source and indication of my bona fides on this article. But if anyone thinks it is inappropriate, go ahead and remove it. :-) BWOgilvie, 16:08, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Suggested move to Carolus Clusius

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

No objections to move--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 03:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clusius is mostly known by his latin name, and that's how he's called almost throughout the article. Wouldn't it be better to move the article to Carolus Clusius (now a redirect), in the same style as Willebrord Snellius, Rumphius, and Petrus Plancius? "Clusius, Carolus" is used in most encyclopedia and biographical dictionaries as well and recommended by the [Library of Congress]. The categories can then less confusingly be sorted by "Clusius, Carolus" as well. Afasmit 07:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After a year I find this page again. A move probably will find little resistance, but I can't simply move it over the Carolus Crusius redirect page, as that page has had more than one edit. I'll go ahead with a move request. Arguments as above. Afasmit (talk) 03:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carolus Clusius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141228154239/http://hortus.leidenuniv.nl/index.php?/english/newsitem/hortus_botanicus_leiden/ to http://hortus.leidenuniv.nl/index.php?/english/newsitem/hortus_botanicus_leiden/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at

Plants High‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

{{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]