Talk:The Trouble with Islam Today
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Trouble with Islam Today article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This content was orihginally started by User:Fridion12. I'm just cleaning up. -- Barfooz (talk) 01:15, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
Second title
[edit]Depending on the country of release, the title is also The Trouble with Islam Today, which is the title used on the author's own site [1], also verifiable on Amazon [2]. This easy-to-check and documented information was strangely suppressed twice:
- On 3 March 2006 by User:Ian Pitchford (diff)
- On 27 March 2006 by User:Pecher (diff)
As well as the quote:
- That doesn't mean I refuse to be a Muslim, it simply means I refuse to join an army of automatons in the name of Allah.
The result of both suppression was a more inflamatory article, since both the preferred title and the quote display a relativized critic against ONE, CURRENT islam, whereas their suppression portrays an absolute critic against ANY AND ALL islam. I'm putting them back.
-- 62.147.37.196 18:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Proposed merger
[edit]This is a no-brainer, people! ... obviously the same book, and no reason for two articles ... decide which title to use per WP:MOS, and redirect the other one. —72.75.85.159 (talk · contribs) 13:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Qualifiers--> Section
[edit]This section is a wreck. Poor grammar, no formatting.
Linda Belanger
[edit]I've removed the section on Linda Belanger. Google reveals only a few blogs where she is cited, which are not WP:RS; and a short opinion piece in "The politics of anti-Semitism," a small anarchist press. Google news reveals zero hits. Her views on Irshad Manji, whatever they may be, do not confer encyclopedic notability on her. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Cover design
[edit]Whoever designed that cover is a freaking genius. 12.200.24.18 (talk) 14:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Revert request
[edit]I don't want to take it upon myself to undo this edit, but it does not seem helpful. this edit here
It contains original, sweeping praise of the work ("incredible response") as well as the author ("renowed[sic] Muslim scholar") and several language errors. There is no source for the book (though it does exist). A mentioning of the book wouldn't be unwelcome, as, though it in-itself is far from notable, it is a response to Manji's book. However, at least the bias should be removed, and the rest of the comment cleaned.
Unfortunately, however, this appears to be the quality of sources for the book, which is why I'm not personally interested in writing about it. Kanjo Kotr (talk) 13:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Books in "Muslim" Languages
[edit]It doesn't look like translations of THE TROUBLE WITH ISLAM TODAY are available anywhere in Arabic, Persian, Urdu and other languages of countries where her book is banned. Can anyone find a link? 174.115.112.134 (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Criticism of Islam
[edit]Wouldn't this be considered "Criticism of Mainstream Islam" than criticism of Islam as a whole? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.60.128.202 (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Trouble with Islam Today. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050207112221/http://canpalnet-ottawa.org/fatah.html to http://www.muslimwakeup.com/main/archives/2003/11/thanks_but_no_t.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Trouble with Islam Today. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202184411/http://www.counterpunch.org/junaid08272008.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/junaid08272008.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.muslimwakeup.com/main/archives/2003/11/thanks_but_no_t.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)