Talk:Rancho Santa Fe, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

San Diego Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Income discrepancy

"Males have a median income of over $100,000 versus $86,933 for females."

But, with females statistically living longer than males the females eventually tend to inherit that wealth. US Census Bureau data shows that, on average, nation-wide, females possess more wealth than males. This is due to the females inheriting the wealth amassed by males.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.50.0.167 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 19 February 2006

This doesn't really have any bearing on the article- you probably want to take this to entries about income disparity.Cottonflop (talk) 13:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources of information?

I imagine some of the information is from people who simply lived there, but what about a listing of some sources in this article?

Particularily interesting (to me) would be any official sources on the country club's practices of black balling, etc.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.127.187 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 1 May 2006

IF you include the total population of African Americans and Native Americans in the Dempgraphics section, you should also include the total population for the other ethnic groups. KTHX!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.241.203.130 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 27 October 2006

Residents

All the references are broken and some entries are nonsense. (Ted Donny, owner of Sony?) 69.105.138.207 22:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One might argue that the "non-families" may in fact be members of the gay community living very much as families. There are many lovely gay residents of Rancho.

References

I removed a lot of "fluff" and some of the notable people. These notable people could not be found under thier reference, so I removed them (because I could not verify them in any way). Also, I took out prominent and changed it to notable, sounds more encyclopedic. 69.227.173.45 01:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Highest Income

Money Magazine says that Hillsborough California is the highest income as of 2006:

1 Hillsborough, CA $263,456

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2007/top25s/highincomes.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.186.100.197 (talk) 04:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation for the colloquialism "Rancho"

I was born and raised in a city adjacent to this community and I've never heard of Rancho Santa Fe being known locally as simply "Rancho". There are also several other communities in San Diego County whose names contain the word 'Rancho'. --crumb^(talk) 21:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have lived in the Covenant for 25 years and raised 3 children there. It is commonly referred to as Rancho as distinguished from surrounding communities — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcsam (talk • contribs) 14:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Residents missing citations

A great deal of the residents and former residents listed lack citations, and have done for nearly a year and a half. Unless there are any objections, I would suggest this start being pruned.Cottonflop (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Covenant" section is advertising

The new section "Covenant..." is mostly advertising, in violation of the most basic Wikipedia rules. In the near future, this section's text will be sharply curtailed and its tone corrected. Wikipedia is not some real estate brochure. Vindemiatrix (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rancho Santa Fe, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20120803120137/http://cookpolitical.com/sites/default/files/pvistate.pdf to http://www.cookpolitical.com/sites/default/files/pvistate.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nun

Snooty community and racist. 2600:1012:B1C2:FE92:7961:FCDB:508A:225D (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]