Talk:King of the Hill (disambiguation)

This page is messy. It needs a disamb page.

There are three articles that are mention in this page and none of them are related. If nobody objects to this within 2-3 days then I probably will put this page as a disamb page. With the current page it seems like the video game multi-player mode, King of the Hill is related to Mike Judge's King of the Hill TV show.

I agree. I've never been happy with the way information on the game and the t.v. show are presented in this article. They're separate topics, but stacking them under sequential headings implies a relationship between the two. We already have King of the Hill (film) so why not (television series) and (game) pages, too? On a side note, the king of the hill game is not just a videogame gameplay mode. The article makes no mention of the children's outdoors game, the game I remember playing as a kid. I'll add a brief note on this to the article. EagleOne 15:04, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)

MegaLoMart

In this article "MegaLoMart" is written like in this sentence. However, on it's main page it is written "Megalomart". Which is the correct spelling? If you know, please correct either this page or the main page. Kooo 00:01, 2004 Sep 17 (UTC)

On Fox's website (fox.com/kingofthehill/) the episode guide has the store name ritten as "Mega Lo Mart." Additionaly, one of the pictures in the Famous Pictures is of a "Welcome to Arlen" road sign, and just below it, is a sign for "MEGA LO MART." So, it looks like it's written out as three words. EagleOne 01:16, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

westside connection

it's a famous westsdie conenction song

Darts meaning

There's a meaning in darts, but I dont know it. Kampy (talk) 13:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation?

I guess we should decide if this is a short disambiguation page or an article about an American-Canadian animated sitcom. Usually, a typical disambiguation page looks like this: [1]. It should not contain too much text related to a particular subject. Restoring Pages (talk) 23:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Restoring Pages: I believe this page should be left as a traditional disambiguation page. I'm unaware of any other disambiguation page that includes an infobox for one of its subjects. The change seems to have been made by an anon who might not be very familiar with how disambiguation pages work. You were correct in reverting addition. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 05:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I cannot but agree with you. Restoring Pages (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 July 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) ~SS49~ {talk} 01:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– This topic actually has WP:NOPRIMARY since despite the popularity of the series, the children's game has longterm significance and is clearly where the show got its name. Due to its historical significance, it has equal precedence to be primary topic despite pageviews. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The TV show is the overwhelming primary topic [2]. Calidum 14:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The show has been off the air for almost 10 years, and, as shown by the pageview stats linked by Calidum, is still getting the most views by a huge margin. In terms of long-term significance, I think it's holding its own. Maybe a few decades from now it'll be time to reconsider. Colin M (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for reasons stated above. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 00:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The show is the primary. Rreagan007 (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose since the show is an iconic show, and is fitting the primary topic criteria. I was actually going into this requested ready to figure out that the Soderbergh movie gets a lot of pageviews too, but it doesn't. I guess it isn't one of his more popular works. --Quiz shows 05:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I'd also note the existance of King of the Hill (chess) however that article is very short, gets less [[3]] and may not be that notable even if possibly primary by PT#2. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the reasons stated above. QuestFour (talk) 18:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.