Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedi Master Obius

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Jedi Master Obius

Delete. The only Google hit this gets is a website that uses the text of this article and nothing else to describe this "character". The farfetched "Obius the Awesome" nickname, coupled with the fact that there is no official mention of Yoda ever having a Master that anyone knows of, is proof enough that the creator of this article made this up himself. Nufy8 17:50, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Because this article uses the entire text of an outside source, it is a copyright violation and can be reported at that page. I've moved this there. Copyvio. Meelar (talk) 17:56, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- According to the outside source, the text they use is from this article, not the other way around. Nufy8 18:07, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete this please Yuckfoo 17:56, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. But it isn't a copyvio for the reason Nufy8 stated, so I removed the copyvio tag. Sarg 18:20, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well it says so on the Yoda page, so it must be true. :-) Delete — RJH 18:38, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable, you are. Wikipedia article have, you will not. Uncle G 20:27, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
Delete. I sense a grave disturbance in the force... It seems that this article is a hoax. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hoax. Jacob1207 23:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted be you will. Fanfic this is, canon not this is, of significance has this zero. WP:FICT. Barno 23:57, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This sounds like the kind of crap supershadow comes up with. Of course, he claims a different name(Bontu Sitmus), but both are complete bantha poodoo. 'The Awesome' title gives it away Lord Patrick 10:07, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Spawn of the Delete Side, this is, list this myself I did plan. As an aside it's already been added into the Yoda article as if to make it seem more official. Weirded. Master Thief Garrett^Talk 03:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without verification-LtNOWIS 19:45, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and freeze those responsible in carbonite. — Phil Welch 06:16, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to make a snappy joke or witty remark. This article needs to be deleted. Period.
Definitely delete.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.