Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shashwat
Appearance
- Please delete this unremarkable Hindu first name meaning eternal. Copyright violation by the way. [1] Not an important Hindu term that only has about three hits that explain its meaning. [2] Not mentioned in the extensive Encyclopedia of Eastern philosophy and religion that I have Andries 12:58, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, if not a speedy delete: inflammatory, incurable POV, proselytizing. Geogre 14:58, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, possible Transwiki to
WikipediaWiktionary?(D'oh! Headslap) Definately Copyright violation. And The Free Dictionary [3] has copied directly from Wikipedia. --VikÞor 18:04, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)- User:Vik-Thor 16:50, 21 Aug 2004, please sign your posts. No comment on the page, but this is Wikipedia(!). The Free Dictionary is entitled to use content under the GFDL. see Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. Dunc_Harris|☺ 17:36, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- (I usually do sign, just forgot. (I think I'll start beginning w/ signature, and add in front...)) I wasn't meaning that the Free Dictionary was copyright violation in copying from Wikipedia. The original article here, that they are using for their source seems to be copyright violation. The first link in Andries's comment. --VikÞor 18:04, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- User:Vik-Thor 16:50, 21 Aug 2004, please sign your posts. No comment on the page, but this is Wikipedia(!). The Free Dictionary is entitled to use content under the GFDL. see Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. Dunc_Harris|☺ 17:36, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. POV, patent nonsense, Wikipedia is not a pulpit. — Gwalla | Talk 23:13, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Copyright violations should be listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:55, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)