Talk:Ken Loach

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warwickshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question of Leadership

Incidentally it is not technically true that the 'Question of Leadership' documentary was banned by the Conservative Government. Actually it was witheld from broadcast by Channel 4 on the grounds of 'lack of balance'. It was then (after an intensive going over by lawyers) cut to a two hour, one part documentary, which was due for broadcast at the time of the Miner's strike, but it was felt to be 'too inflammatory' and again its broadcast was 'postponed'. To date it has never been broadcast on British TV. (Comment by 130.209.6.40)

I've changed the article. Can you point us to some more concrete sources on this? Jihg 19:53, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

Politics

Perhaps we should mention Ken Loach's involvement in politics:

French presidential candidate Olivier Besancenot is endorsed by British filmmaker Ken Loach, known for his depictions of working-class struggles.^[1]

David.Monniaux 07:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC) the reaseon ken loach isnt a great filmmaker is he allows his political views get in the way and a lot of his films seem to have long drawn out political discussions in the middle Bouse23 19:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And it should be mentioned that he is of the Loony Left, a virulent hater of Jews and Israel. A liar for and appeaser of evil. A man with no moral compass. Typical of his like, he demonises Israel and accuses it of aparthied when he would agree to its genocide and policide! The man is scum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.87.248 (talk) 09:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment the 'politics' section consists almost entirely of details of his comments on Israel. This is not a significant aspect of his work and does not belong here. Cooke (talk) 09:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some 700 words on his film work, some 750 on his political life consisting "almost entirely of details of his comments on Israel. " For people wanting to drive traffic through their second-life Wiki entries, being considered anti-semitic might do the trick! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.249.54.119 (talk) 11:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should the paragraph on Loach's attitude toward the difficulty of claiming benefits in the UK not go in the Political Activities section (possibly renamed) instead of under the general introduction? VanBoek (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/60d490fc-dc33-11db-a21d-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=e17a8288-890f-11db-a876-0000779e2340.html Cause célèbre], Financial Times

Image copyright problem with Image:Cathycomehome.JPG

The image Image:Cathycomehome.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Realism?

Yesterday I've got the chance to watch Carravaggio from Ken Loach. This film isn't mentioned, but there is the question :

Which side are you on? from the same year, told. This special film isn't a film to me, there are figures out of Carravaggio's kosmos and rooms well lightend. The action depends on this aethetic, directing figures and room. The in German so called Biographie isn't real told. Myth and fact are mixed out of the dying painters perspective. and it#s no realism! Dreaming gay aethetic! Building beautiful picture with less sense.--Danaide (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extra info on NNDB

NNDB states that he is married with five grown up children. Can someone confirm that, as NNDB is not considered reliable enough to cite in Wikipedia articles. It also states that he was elected for RESPECT in 2004. Was he elected a councillor for them? If so, is he still a member of that party, and still a councillor? Nietzsche 2 (talk) 09:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Err excuse me guys

When I read this discussion Page, there was not one Movie made by Loach being discussed. What is this guy, a Movie maker or Political Activist?Johnwrd (talk) 01:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if you havent noticed yet wikipedia seems to always be very very interested in someones political stance. even if its only a paragraph about someone they'll almost always be sure to tell the reader whether or not the person was a liberal or a conservative. It all goes way beyond suspicious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.170.5.80 (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb links

Really necessary in the text? Looks ugly. The movies themselves are wikilinked, and these IMDB links are too much IMO. I suggest they are removed. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 10:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Dudley Edwards criticism

"Like Hidden Agenda before it, The Wind That Shakes the Barley was criticised by Ruth Dudley Edwards for allegedly being too sympathetic to the Irish Republican Army and Provisional Irish Republican Army, though it would transpire that Edwards had not seen the film." Is criticism of a film by someone who hasn't seen it really justified? If no-one comes up with a robust answer I'll remove it. Cooke (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ken Loach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120514094055/http://www.bfi.org.uk:80/features/bfi100/ to http://www.bfi.org.uk/features/bfi100

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ken Loach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of his membership in the The Oxford Revue?

It seems like a pretty crucial link from studying law to directing films. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/60d490fc-dc33-11db-a21d-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=e17a8288-890f-11db-a876-0000779e2340.html Cause célèbre], Financial Times

[1]