User talk:Irmgard

To leave me a message, click here!

I'll answer messages either here or directly in the appropriate article talk page.

Archive 2003-2005

the Fair Game (Scientology) article

Fair_Game_(Scientology) I am about to make large, sweeping changes to that article. As your name appears as one of the editors, as you seem to be as misinformed as other editors who have created false and misleading information there, I thought you would want to know. Feel free to message me either on my user talk page or in the discussion area of that article where I have estensively spelled out the reasons for the changes I'll be making. Terryeo 19:24, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Local Church controversy

Care to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local Church controversy? Do you know any reliable sources for criticism? --Pjacobi 20:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UN "Food Shortage" survey

The United Nations conducted a worldwide survey with one single question:

   "Would you please give your opinion about solutions to the
   food shortage in the rest of the world?"

Frank SouthworthFCSouthworth 17:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for translating

Thank you SO much for translating the article for Ferdinand Sigg, U.M.C. Bishop!! I was hoping someone with more German than me would do so. God bless you!! Pastorwayne 16:26, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Within the next days you'll also get an article on Franz Schäfer. Irmgard 16:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the article on John Louis Nuelsen in English, as well!! God bless you!! Pastorwayne 21:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 21:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just come across your comment on the Brethren of the Free Spirit. Do you happen to know if group sexual practice was included in their beliefs? I'm trying to confirm this for a book I'm writing. Thank you.

CPR

earlofbilgewater@yahoo.com

Introvigne

Hallo Irmgard, Du hast das [1] damals eingefügt... kannst Du Dich an die Quelle erinnern, oder an irgendwelche Stichworte zum Suchen? Ich hab das seinerzeit auch gelesen, die Info ist zumindest nicht falsch. --Tilman 19:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is a secret - at least its also mentioned in the first para of Pontifical University of the Holy Cross - you could check the sources there or ask for them. I probably did look up some (critical) Italian or Spanish sources on Opus Dei and Introvigne as well but I can't recall any details at the moment. There is especially one Introvigne Critic Celeber, Celebex or so. Irmgard 10:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on User:GLGermans statements regarding German Wikipedia

Just for the record: de:Benutzer:Irmgard used no admin function but requested a page protection due to ongoing edit war [2]. Page was protected by a neutral admin [3]. Later GLGerman and a third user were blocked by another admin for 6 hours due to a perceived edit war on the talk page of the protected article [4]. There might be some doubts about this edit war, but these two users do have a history of mutual edit wars and both have been blocked repeatedly for this [5] [6] - so several admins do have their hand on the trigger when they read these names. de:Benutzer:Jergen did not abuse his admin powers either: he reported today an obvious personal attack by GLGerman on me in the correct place [7], and GLGerman was blocked for 12 hours by the same neutral admin as on 2nd March [8], which was seen as rather too short a period by two more admins (which are not Evangelical either) [9]. Irmgard 15:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just for the record, Irmgard is the most evangelical promoter on german wikipedia and translates the most evangelical articles from english to german wikipedia. And so people, who write on german wikipedia for homosexual and liberal religious themes, have on german wikipedia the most conflicts with german admin Irmgard. GLGerman 15:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#Characteristics of problem editors and Wikipedia:Assume bad faith Irmgard 17:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject updates

I have done some updating to the WP:SCN, added some new articles, added a "to do" list to the top of the project, and fixed up some categories and assessment stuff. I suggest we should all pick one article at a time, or at most two, to work on bringing up to Featured Article status. You could give input on the project's talk page... Smee 21:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Also, a Userbox for project members, {{User Scientology project}} Smee 21:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The Commons Ambassador Barnstar

		The Commons Ambassador Barnstar
		For your wonderful and varied image contributions, Thank you. Yours, Smee 23:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to post to your user page and/or leave on your talk page as you see fit, except of course this message itself. Smee 23:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you :-)Irmgard 09:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Religion

Hi Irmgard, I was just wondering why you believe that your religion is the right one. What drew you to that specific religion? I’m doing research for my thesis and I’d like to get a discussion going. Get back to me. All the best. MagicBullet5 (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is no subject to discuss in Wikipedia. Irmgard (talk) 23:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Irmgard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 709 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Heinrich Bolleter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gabriel of Comane - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gabriel of Comane

The article Gabriel of Comane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Gabriel of Comane – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 10:53, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added a link with his official biography in French. Irmgard (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Langone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Langone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Langone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Oscar Lopez

Are you able to identify where he received his PhD please?Zigzig20s (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to his CSUN page, New York State University, Buffalo. Irmgard (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Irmgard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Irmgard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Group Member notice

Your name is listed as a participant of the WikiProject Countering system bias in religion.
I would like to know if you agree with this edit: DIFF.
24.78.228.96 (talk) 11:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anti-cult movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anti-cult movement, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-cult movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Journal reference link

Template:Journal reference link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Certificat Supérieur de Français" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Certificat Supérieur de Français has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27 § Certificat Supérieur de Français until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 13:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]