Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stock image
No-one seems to have created this page, so I suppose I will. I'm not sure why this got listed on VfD. It seems real enough based on some quick googling. It may be worthwhile to disambig the page from stock images / stock photography though Zachlipton 05:10, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Pay attention to your google search. Look at the main website that comes up thats NOT stock photography, which should be the website linked too by the article. Look at who wrote that website. Then look at the history of the article to see who wrote it. Its the same person, neologism and primary research. Delete.
- Ok fair enough. Delete. Looks like a neologism to me, besides, people looking for "stock image" want to know about pictures, not finance. Zachlipton 16:30, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- It looks very like original research. All the greenfinch links point back to his own site - ie. not to a published book, for example. delete.--Tomheaton 17:08, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC) (+ further edits but I don't know how to do strikethroughs).
- Delete. Would it be useful to move stock photography to stock image? -Sean Curtin 04:06, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)