Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NMNHNLM

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:11, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NMNHNLM

Last of three being nominated for deletion by me. As again, extremely limited exposure of the acronym, with a user base that hardly constitutes even a full forum. CABAL 08:15, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable foreign acronym. Megan1967 10:29, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. "Foreign" is pretty subjective though and not a valid reason for deletion. Leithp 15:46, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neo-acronym, not in widespread use and not significant to the general public nor to any field of knowledge. "Foreign" in terms of "not being used in the USA" (substitute "UK" or "Canada" or even "Australia") is not a valid reason for deletion, although "not used in English-language speaking or writing" could be, since this is the English-language edition of WP, with separate content from the Deutsche-language version. Of course, those who RTFA'ed before voting know that the acronym is for an English-language phrase. Barno 20:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Longhair | Talk 02:43, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 02:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.