User talk:Lensim

Aerodynamic Lift

Lensim- Would you be so kind as to modify your comment and put it in the article for Lift (force) A section on the general causes and physics behind lift would be nice. Theon 18:24, Aug 27, 2004 (UTC)

Certainly, with your guidance

I would be happy to add to the article. I am new to wikipedia, so...

1) should I simply add text, even if it conflicts with already existing text, or

2) should I also modify existing text. If so, what level of modification is usually appropriate? Are major rewrites accepted or should it be kept to a minimum?

I don't want to step on anyone's toes.

Thanks for any guidance you can provide.

--Mike L 21:22, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC) (Lensim)

Tom Brown, Jr.

Awesome work with the Tom Brown page, I had looked there a couple months ago and found there wasn't a page, i was just going there to make one now, when i realized there already was one. ill add anything i can. good work. :) SECProto 21:21, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

In response to what you said on my user page, I am not actually familiar with Tom Brown Jr in real life. However, I have read several of his books, and my brother has read them all. My brother has also went to a local nature awareness summer thing (the person who put it on took a course with tom brown, i think) about 10 years ago, i guess that would be where he first heard of him. SECProto 18:37, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

Tasaday

The Tasaday were neither a Tas nor a day. Discuss. Lensim 17:51, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello. Here's the template I replaced the sidebar with. It's now in the Tasaday page. --Nino Gonzales 13:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! --Lensim 17:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Modified template so as this page won't show up at Category:People of the Philippines. --Howard the Duck | talk, 15:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ivermectin

Lensim - please help me out a little. I am new at navigating Wikipedia. I posted a question on the Ivermectin page, and since you responded to another question (a year or so ago), I am coming directly to you. I guess there is no way to contact the writer of the article. Would you be so kind as to check the Ivermectin page and, if you can, answer the question? Or point me in the right direction? Or tell me to drop dead? Thanks, Lensim! Margaret now 13:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded at Talk:Ivermectin. I hunted down the person who added the information you question. They have no discussion page as yet but you can start one, and perhaps they will respond. I found who it was by judicious use of the "compare selected versions" function on the Ivermectin history page. Hope this helps. Lensim 16:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Lensim! I appreciate your prompt response. Margaret now 18:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bobcat#Tracks

I'm wondering if you added the info to this section, as you uploaded the picture of the tracks. We were hoping to get a source for it. Cheers, Marskell 14:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should ask. I did create that section, and I did source it. Some time ago, someone made minor changes, removed my source reference, and replaced it with their own. Anyway, here is the source: Tom Brown's Field Guide to Nature Observation and Tracking by Tom Brown, Jr., ISBN 9780425099667. --Lensim 14:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, thank you (funny I got you at a logged-in moment). My concern is that in googling I see feral cat tracks do not actually appear to be rounded, but also show the indentation. What do you think? Marskell 14:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree that house cat tracks often show the indentation at the top of the foot pad. (One only needs to look at a cat's paws to see this). The odd thing is that most drawings of house cat tracks show the rounded "one-humped" upper foot pad. In summary, from what I've seen, actual house cat tracks are quite like bobcat tracks, only markedly smaller (and tend to occur near houses, not in the wilderness, etc). I have just re-read the tracks section as it stands. The reference above is valid only for track/stride measurements and the directly register comment. Since you are improving the article (thanks btw), two things:

the image caption is missing the word "mud"
the directly register wiki link should point to an article entitled direct register as this is the better phrasing for the general phenomenon

--Lensim 15:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be fair to say that sometimes the domestic has a single rounded hump.[1] But it's equivocal and not the most pressing info, so I removed it. I actually dug up your old edit and added the 2x2 figure. (Did I mix inches square with squared inches?—I hate that.) Also, I threw in a weblink suggesting 1.8 inches is the average length; happily, your photo shows that length almost exactly.

The redlink does go to directly register BTW; the 's' is outside the square brackets. Cheers, Marskell 16:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that all looks excellent. Nice. But on the redlink, my concern is not the 's', but the 'ly'. Keep up the good work. --Lensim 16:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, of course. We shouldn't use adverbials in titles. Thanks for all your help. Marskell 19:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lensim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lensim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lensim. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lensim. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David R. Stone has been accepted

David R. Stone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 02:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joel Hardin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Hardin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Hardin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Finngall ^talk 22:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Hatchimori (Nagano) (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a valid source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mount Hatchimori (Nagano) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lensim! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I have resubmitted this as Draft:Mount Hachimori (Nagano) due to a spelling mistake in the original title. This new version has more appropriate sources. Just FYI, and thanks again! Lensim (talk) 22:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Hachimori (Nagano) has been accepted

Mount Hachimori (Nagano), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 03:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mount Hatchimori (Nagano)

Hello, Lensim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mount Hatchimori".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]