Jump to content

Axial Age

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Part of a series on
Human history
↑ Prehistory (Stone Age)   (Pleistocene epoch)
Holocene
Ancient
Postclassical
Modern
See also
↓ Future   

Axial Age (also Axis Age,[1] from the German Achsenzeit) is a term coined by the German philosopher Karl Jaspers. It refers to broad changes in religious and philosophical thought that occurred in a variety of locations from about the 8th to the 3rd century BCE.

According to Jaspers, during this period, universalizing modes of thought appeared in Persia, India, China, the Levant, and the Greco-Roman world, in a striking parallel development, without any obvious admixture between these disparate cultures. Jaspers identified key thinkers from this age who had a profound influence on future philosophies and religions, and identified characteristics common to each area from which those thinkers emerged.

The historical validity of the Axial Age is disputed.[2][3][4] Some criticisms of Jaspers include the lack of a demonstrable common denominator between the intellectual developments that are supposed to have emerged in unison across ancient Greece, the Levant, India, and China; lack of any radical discontinuity with "preaxial" and "postaxial" periods; and exclusion of pivotal figures that do not fit the definition (for example, Jesus, Muhammad, and Akhenaten).[5]

Despite these criticisms, the Axial Age continues to be an influential idea, with many scholars accepting that profound changes in religious and philosophical discourse did indeed take place but disagreeing as to the underlying reasons. To quote Robert Bellah and Hans Joas, "The notion that in significant parts of Eurasia the middle centuries of the first millennium BCE mark a significant transition in human cultural history, and that this period can be referred to as the Axial Age, has become widely, but not universally, accepted."[6]

Origin of the idea of Axial Age

[edit]

Jaspers introduced the concept of an Axial Age in his book Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte (The Origin and Goal of History),[7] published in 1949. The simultaneous appearance of thinkers and philosophers in different areas of the world had been remarked by numerous authors since the 18th century, notably by the French Indologist Abraham Hyacinthe Anquetil-Duperron.[8] Jaspers explicitly cited some of these authors, including Victor von Strauß (1859) and Ernst von Lasaulx (1870).[8] He was unaware of the first fully nuanced theory from 1873 by John Stuart Stuart-Glennie, forgotten by Jaspers' time, and which Stuart-Glennie termed "the moral revolution".[9][10][11] Stuart-Glennie and Jaspers both claimed that the Axial Age should be viewed as an objective empirical fact of history, independently of religious considerations.[12][13] Jaspers argued that during the Axial Age, "the spiritual foundations of humanity were laid simultaneously and independently in China, India, Persia, Judea, and Greece. And these are the foundations upon which humanity still subsists today."[14]

Jaspers identified a number of key thinkers as having had a profound influence on future philosophies and religions, and identified characteristics common to each area from which those thinkers emerged. Jaspers held up this age as unique and one to which the rest of the history of human thought might be compared.

Characteristics

[edit]
Jaspers argued that the Axial Age gave birth to philosophy as a discipline

Jaspers presented his first outline of the Axial age by a series of examples:

Confucius and Lao-Tse were living in China, all the schools of Chinese philosophy came into being, including those of Mo Ti, Chuang Tse, Lieh Tzu and a host of others; India produced the Upanishads and Buddha and, like China, ran the whole gamut of philosophical possibilities down to materialism, scepticism and nihilism; in Iran, Zarathustra taught a challenging view of the world as a struggle between good and evil; in Ancient Israel the prophets made their appearance from Elijah by way of Isaiah and Jeremiah to Deutero-Isaiah; Greece witnessed the appearance of Homer, of the philosophers—Parmenides, Heraclitus and Plato—of the tragedians, of Thucydides and Archimedes. Everything implied by these names developed during these few centuries almost simultaneously in China, India and the West.[15]

Jaspers described the Axial Age as "an interregnum between two ages of great empire, a pause for liberty, a deep breath bringing the most lucid consciousness".[16] It has also been suggested that the Axial Age was a historically liminal period, when "old certainties had lost their validity and new ones were still not ready".[17]

Jaspers had a particular interest in the similarities in circumstance and thought of its figures. Similarities included an engagement in the quest for human meaning[18] and the rise of a new élite class of religious leaders and thinkers in China, India and the Mediterranean.[19]

Individual thinkers each laid spiritual foundations within a framework of a changing social environment. Jaspers argues that the characteristics appeared under similar political circumstances: China, India, the Middle East and the Occident each comprised multiple small states engaged in internal and external struggles. The three regions all gave birth to, and then institutionalized, a tradition of travelling scholars,[20] who roamed from city to city to exchange ideas. After the Spring and Autumn period (8th to 5th centuries BCE) and the Warring States period (5th to 3rd centuries BCE), Taoism and Confucianism emerged in China. In other regions, the scholars largely developed extant religious traditions; in India, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism; in Persia, Zoroastrianism; in the Levant, Judaism; and in Greece, Sophism and other classical philosophies.

Many of the cultures of the Axial Age have been[when?] considered second-generation societies because they developed on the basis of societies which preceded them.[21][need quotation to verify][22]

Thinkers and movements

[edit]

In China, the Hundred Schools of Thought (c. 6th century BCE) were in contention and Confucianism and Taoism arose during this era, and in this area it remains a profound influence on social and religious life.

Zoroastrianism, another of Jaspers' examples, is one of the first monotheistic religions. William W. Malandra and R. C. Zaehner, suggest that Zoroaster may indeed have been an early contemporary of Cyrus the Great living around 550 BCE.[23] Mary Boyce and other leading scholars who once supported much earlier dates for Zarathustra/Zoroaster have recently changed their position on when he likely lived, so that there is an emerging consensus regarding him as a contemporary or near-contemporary of Cyrus the Great.[24]

Jainism propagated the religion of sramanas (previous Tirthankaras) and influenced Indian philosophy by propounding the principles of ahimsa (non-violence), karma, samsara, and asceticism.[25] Mahavira (24th Tirthankara in the 5th century BCE),[26][27] known as a fordmaker of Jainism and a contemporary with the Buddha, lived during this age.[28][29][30]

Buddhism, also of the sramana tradition of India, was another of the world's most influential philosophies, founded by Siddhartha Gautama, or the Buddha, who lived c. 5th century BCE; its spread was aided by Ashoka, who lived late in the period.

Rabbinic Judaism accounts for its hard shift away from idolatry/polytheism (which was more common among Biblical Israelites) by mythologizing the eradication of the Evil Inclination for idolatry which was said to occur in the early Second Temple period. It has been argued that this development in monotheism relates to the axial shifts described by Jaspers.[31]

Jaspers' axial shifts included the rise of Platonism (c. 4th century BCE) and Neoplatonism (3rd century AD), which would later become a major influence on the Western world through both Christianity and secular thought throughout the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance.

Reception

[edit]

In addition to Jaspers, the philosopher Eric Voegelin referred to this age as The Great Leap of Being, constituting a new spiritual awakening and a shift of perception from societal to individual values.[32] Thinkers and teachers like the Buddha, Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Anaxagoras contributed to such awakenings which Plato would later call anamnesis, or a remembering of things forgotten.[citation needed]

David Christian notes that the first "universal religions" appeared in the age of the first universal empires and of the first all-encompassing trading networks.[33]

Anthropologist David Graeber has pointed out that "the core period of Jasper's Axial age ... corresponds almost exactly to the period in which coinage was invented. What's more, the three parts of the world where coins were first invented were also the very parts of the world where those sages lived; in fact, they became the epicenters of Axial Age religious and philosophical creativity."[34] Drawing on the work of classicist Richard Seaford and literary theorist Marc Shell on the relation between coinage and early Greek thought, Graeber argues that an understanding of the rise of markets is necessary to grasp the context in which the religious and philosophical insights of the Axial Age arose. The ultimate effect of the introduction of coinage was, he argues, an "ideal division of spheres of human activity that endures to this day: on the one hand the market, on the other, religion".[35]

German sociologist Max Weber played an important role in Jaspers' thinking.[36][37][38] Shmuel Eisenstadt argues in the introduction to The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations that Weber's work in his The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism and Ancient Judaism provided a background for the importance of the period, and notes parallels with Eric Voegelin's Order and History.[19] In the same book, Shmuel Eisenstadt analyses economic circumstances relating to the coming of the Axial Age in Greece.[39]

Wider acknowledgement of Jaspers' work came after it was presented at a conference and published in Daedalus in 1975, and Jaspers' suggestion that the period was uniquely transformative generated important discussion among other scholars, such as Johann Arnason.[38] Religious historian Karen Armstrong explored the period in her book The Great Transformation,[40] and the theory has been the focus of numerous academic conferences.[41] In literature, Gore Vidal in his novel Creation covers much of this Axial Age through the fictional perspective of a Persian adventurer.

Usage of the term has expanded beyond Jaspers' original formulation. Yves Lambert argues that the Enlightenment was a Second Axial Age, including thinkers such as Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein, wherein relationships between religion, secularism, and traditional thought are changing.[42] A collective History of the Axial Age has been published in 2019:[43] generally the authors contested the existence of an "identifiable Axial Age confined to a few Eurasian hotspots in the last millennium BCE" but tended to accept “axiality” as a cluster of traits emerging time and again whenever societies reached a certain threshold of scale and level of complexity.

Besides time, usage of the term has expanded beyond the original field. A philosopher, Jaspers focused on philosophical development of the Age. Historians Hermann Kulke and Max Ostrovsky demonstrated that the Age is even more Axial in historical and geopolitical senses. Jaspers, in fact, noted the tip of the iceberg. Pre-Axial cultures, he wrote, were dominated by the river valley civilizations while by the end of the Axial Age rose universal empires which dominated history for centuries since.[44] With the researches of Kulke and Ostrovsky the whole iceberg emerged. Universal empires did not come by the end of the Axial Age. The first of them, Persia came at the peak of the Axial Age and conquered Mesopotamia and Egypt. Both ceased to be civilizations in themselves and became provinces in a completely new form of imperial system which stretched from India to Greece. Thus the Bronze Age civilizations were succeeded by Axial civilizations with their universal empires.[45] Before forming another universal empire, the Chinese civilization expanded at the peak of the Axial Age, turning the original core into Country in the Middle (Chung-kuo). The new geopolitical setting of China changed less in the following two millennia than it did in the Axial Age.[46] The Axial Age formed two major geopolitical systems, a wider China and a much vaster Indo-Mediterranean system. The two were separated from each other by Tibet which limited their political and military contacts[47][48] but both systems were linked by the Silk Road creating a trans-Eurasian trade belt stretching from the Pacific to the Atlantic.

Several scholars supposed ecological prime trigger for the rise of this Axial belt [49] Stephen Sanderson researched religious evolution in the Axial Age, arguing that religions and religious change in general are essentially biosocial adaptations to changing environments.[50] Ostrovsky suggests increased fertility in the rainy zones of the Eurasian temperate belt.[51] He regards the Axial belt of civilizations as the embryo of the present Global North. It shifted northward during the Middle Ages due to climatic change and after the Seafaring Revolution penetrated to the temperate North America. "But from historical point of view, it is the same imperial belt which first appeared in the Axial Age."[52]

The validity of the concept has been called into question. In 2006 Diarmaid MacCulloch called the Jaspers thesis "a baggy monster, which tries to bundle up all sorts of diversities over four very different civilisations, only two of which had much contact with each other during the six centuries that (after adjustments) he eventually singled out, between 800 and 200 BCE".[53] Jaspers himself had already noted this on page 2 of The Origin and Goal of History, where he says that one of the puzzles of the Axial Age is precisely that of a similar phenomenon simultaneously occurring in three civilizations which had no contact with each other.[54] In 2013, another comprehensive critique appears in Iain Provan's book Convenient Myths: The Axial Age, Dark Green Religion, and the World That Never Was.[55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Meister, Chad (2009). Introducing Philosophy of Religion. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-203-88002-9.
  2. ^ Spinney L. (2019). "When did societies become modern? 'Big history' dashes popular idea of Axial Age". Nature. 576 (7786): 189–190. Bibcode:2019Natur.576..189S. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03785-w. PMID 31822841.
  3. ^ Smith A. (2015). "Between facts and myth: Karl Jaspers and the actuality of the axial age". International Journal of Philosophy and Theology. 76 (4): 315–334. doi:10.1080/21692327.2015.1136794. hdl:2066/155741.
  4. ^ Mullins, Daniel Austin; Hoyer, Daniel; Collins, Christina; Currie, Thomas; Feeney, Kevin; François, Pieter; Savage, Patrick E.; Whitehouse, Harvey; Turchin, Peter (2018). "A Systematic Assessment of "Axial Age" Proposals Using Global Comparative Historical Evidence". American Sociological Review. 83 (3): 596–626. doi:10.1177/0003122418772567. hdl:10871/36086. ISSN 0003-1224. S2CID 150014307.
  5. ^ Iain Provan, Convenient Myths: The Axial Age, Dark Green Religion, And The World That Never Was, 2013, Baylor, pp. 1–40.
  6. ^ Bellah, Robert N.; Joas (2012). The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. p. 1.
  7. ^ Karl Jaspers, Origin and Goal of History, Routledge Revivals, 2011, p. 2.
  8. ^ a b Metzler, Dieter (2009). "Achsenzeit als Ereignis und Geschichte" [Axial age as happening and history] (PDF). Internet-Beiträge zur Ägyptologie und Sudanarchäologie (IBAES) (in German). 10: 169. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  9. ^ Eugene Halton (2014). From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution: John Stuart-Glennie, Karl Jaspers, and a New Understanding of the Idea. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-137-47350-9.
  10. ^ Halton, Eugene (2017). "Sociology's Missed Opportunity: John Stuart-Glennie's Lost Theory of the Moral Revolution, Also Known as the Axial Age". Journal of Classical Sociology. 17 (3): 191–212. doi:10.1177/1468795X17691434. S2CID 152276051 – via Philpapers.
  11. ^ Halton, Eugene (2019). "The Axial Age, The Moral Revolution, and the Polarization of Life and Spirit". Existenz. 13 (2): 56–71.
  12. ^ Stuart-Glennie J. S., 1873, In the Morningland: Or, the Law of the Origin and Transformation of Christianity – Vol. 1: The New Philosophy of History. London: Longmans, Green, and Company, pp. vii–viii.
  13. ^ Jaspers K., The Origin and Goal of History, p. 1.
  14. ^ Jaspers, Karl (2003). The Way to Wisdom : An Introduction to Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. p. 98. ISBN 0-300-09735-2..
  15. ^ Karl Jaspers, Origin and Goal of History, p. 2
  16. ^ Jaspers 1953, p. 51 quoted in Armstrong 2006, p. 367.
  17. ^ Thomassen, Bjorn (2010), "Anthropology, multiple modernities and the axial age debate", Anthropological Theory, 10 (4): 333, doi:10.1177/1463499610386659, S2CID 143930719
  18. ^ Neville, Robert Cummings (2002). Religion in Late Modernity. SUNY Press. p. 104. ISBN 0-7914-5424-X.
  19. ^ a b Eisenstadt, SN (1986). "Introduction". The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. SUNY Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN 0-88706-094-3.
  20. ^ Jaspers, Karl (28 March 2021) [1949]. The Origin and Goal of History. Routledge Classics. Translated by Bullock, Michael. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 9781000357790. Retrieved 14 March 2023. Hermits and wandering thinkers in China, ascetics in India, philosophers in Greece and prophets in Israel all belong together [...] [peripatetics founded] schools which are termed academies by sinologists: the sophists and philosophers of Hellas travelled about in similar fashion and Buddha passed his entire life in wandering from place to place.
  21. ^ Pollard, Elizabeth; Rosenberg, Clifford; Tignor, Robert (2011). Worlds Together, Worlds Apart. New York: Norton. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-393-91847-2.
  22. ^ Grinin, Leonid E.; Korotayev, Andrey V. (17 November 2017). "Origins of Globalization in the Framework of the Afroeurasian World-System History". In Hall, Thomas D. (ed.). Comparing Globalizations: Historical and World-Systems Approaches. World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures. Chan, Switzerland: Springer. p. 55. ISBN 9783319682198. Retrieved 14 March 2023. This is the Axial Age period, the period of the emergence of the second generation civilizations.
  23. ^ Malandra, William (1983). An Introduction to Ancient Iranian Religion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0-8166-1114-9.
  24. ^ Brown, Brian Arthur (2012). Three Testaments: Torah, Gospel, and Quran. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 23–24. ISBN 978-1-4422-1492-7.
  25. ^ Zydenbos, Robert J (2006). Jainism Today and Its Future. München: Manya Verlag. pp. 11, 56–57, 59..
  26. ^ Cort, John E. (2001). Jains in the World: Religious Values and Ideology in India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-513234-2.
  27. ^ Rapson, E. J. (1955). The Cambridge History of India. Cambridge University Press.
  28. ^ "Mahavira", Britannica Concise Encyclopedia, Encyclopædia Britannica, 2006.
  29. ^ Fisher, Mary Pat (1997). Living Religions: An Encyclopedia of the World's Faiths. London: IB Tauris. p. 115. ISBN 1-86064-148-2.
  30. ^ "Rude Travel: Down The Sages Vir Sanghavi". 13 September 2013.
  31. ^ Klein, Reuven Chaim (2018). "The End of an Age: Idolatry as Obsolete Superstition". God versus Gods: Judasim in the Age of Idolatry. Mosaica Press. pp. 263–264. ISBN 978-1946351463. OL 27322748M.
  32. ^ Voegelin, Eric (2000) [1985]. Order and History (Volume V): In Search of Order. Collected Works. Vol. 18. Columbia: The University of Missouri Press. ISBN 978-0-8262-1261-0.
  33. ^ Christian, David (2004). Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. California World History Library. Vol. 2. University of California Press. p. 319. ISBN 978-0-520-23500-7. Retrieved 2013-12-29. Not until the first millennium BCE do the first universal religions appear. Though associated in practice with particular dynasties or empires, they proclaimed universal truths and worshiped all-powerful gods. It is no accident that universal religions appeared when both empires and exchange networks reached to the edge of the known universe. Nor is it an accident that one of the earliest religions of this type, Zoroastrianism, appeared in the largest empire of the mid-first millennium BCE, that of the Achaemenids, and at the hub of trade routes that were weaving Afro-Eurasia into a single world system. Indeed, most of the universal religions appeared in the hub region between Mesopotamia and northern India. They included Zoroastrianism and Manichaeism in Persia, Buddhism in India, Confucianism in China, and Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the Mediterranean world.
  34. ^ Graeber 2011, p. 224.
  35. ^ Graeber 2011, p. 249
  36. ^ "Karl Jaspers". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-14.
  37. ^ Szakolczai, Arpad (2003). The Genesis of Modernity (First hardcover ed.). UK: Routledge. pp. 80–81. ISBN 0-415-25305-5.
  38. ^ a b Szakolczai, Arpad (2006). "Historical sociology". Encyclopedia of Social Theory. UK: Routledge. p. 251. ISBN 0-415-29046-5.
  39. ^ Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (2012). "Introduction: The Axial Age Breakthrough in Ancient Greece". In Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (ed.). The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. SUNY series in Near Eastern Studies. SUNY Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-1438401942. Retrieved 2015-06-28. The emergence of this specific type of Axial Age breakthrough was connected with the special mode of disintegration of the tribal communities and of construction of new collectivities and institutional complexes. [...] In the economic field, we find a growing occupational differentiation between the economic ties to the land and the urban vocations, be they in trade, craft, industry, or the ritual and educational fields. This phenomenon was also very closely connected with the development of many free economic resources—partially even land and manpower resources—not bound to ascriptive social units, the concomitant development of widespread internal and external, relatively free, market activities, and the accumulation of relatively mobile capital.
  40. ^ Armstrong 2006.
  41. ^ Strath, Bo (2005). "Axial Transformations". Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved 2006-06-14.
  42. ^ Lambert, Yves (1999). "Religion in Modernity as a New Axial Age: Secularization or New Religious Forms?". Sociology of Religion. 60 (3): 303–333. doi:10.2307/3711939. JSTOR 3711939. Archived from the original on 2012-07-26. Retrieved 2017-08-24.
  43. ^ Seshat History of the Axial Age, ed. D.Hoyer and J. Reddish, Beresta books, 2019
  44. ^ Karl Jaspers, Origin and Goal of History, p. 6.
  45. ^ Kulke, Herman (1986). "The historical background of India's Axial Age," The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations, (ed. Eisenstadt, Samuel, Albania: New York State University Press), p 390-391.
  46. ^ Ostrovsky, Max (2006). The Hyperbola of the World Order, (Lanham: University Press of America), p XXII.
  47. ^ Kulke, Herman (1986). "The historical background of India's Axial Age," The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations, (ed. Eisenstadt, Samuel, Albania: New York State University Press), p 326.
  48. ^ Ostrovsky, Max (2006). The Hyperbola of the World Order, (Lanham: University Press of America) Ostrovsky, Max (2006). The Hyperbola of the World Order, (Lanham: University Press of America), p 46.
  49. ^ Whitaker M. (2009). Ecological Revolution: The Political Origins of Environmental Degradation and the Environmental Origins of Axial Religions; China, Japan, Europe
  50. ^ Stephen K. Sanderson (2018). Religious Evolution and the Axial Age: From Shamans to Priests to Prophets (Scientific Studies of Religion: Inquiry and Explanation), Bloomsbury Academic.
  51. ^ Ostrovsky, Max (2006). The Hyperbola of the World Order, (Lanham: University Press of America), p 94, 96.
  52. ^ Ostrovsky, Max (2006). The Hyperbola of the World Order, (Lanham: University Press of America), p 112.
  53. ^ MacCulloch, Diarmaid (17 March 2006). "The axis of goodness". The Guardian.
  54. ^ Karl Jaspers, Origin and Goal of History, p. 2
  55. ^ Provan 2013.

General and cited references

[edit]
  • Armstrong, Karen (2006), The Great Transformation: The Beginning of our Religious Traditions (1st ed.), New York: Knopf, ISBN 0-676-97465-1. A semi-historic description of the events and milieu of the Axial Age.
  • Graeber, David (2011), Debt: The First 5000 Years, Brooklyn: Melville House Press.
  • Jaspers, Karl (1953), The Origin and Goal of History, Bullock, Michael (Tr.) (1st English ed.), London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, LCCN 53001441. Originally published as Jaspers, Karl (1949), Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte [The origin and goal of History] (in German) (1st ed.), München: Piper, LCCN 49057321.
  • Provan, Iain (2013), Convenient Myths: The Axial Age, Dark Green Religion, and the World That Never Was, Waco: Baylor University Press, ISBN 978-1602589964.
  • Eisenstadt, S. N., ed. (1986). The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0887060960.
  • Joas, Hans, and Robert N. Bellah, eds. (2012), The Axial Age and Its Consequences, Belknap Press, ISBN 978-0674066496.
  • Halton, Eugene (2014), From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution: John Stuart-Glennie, Karl Jaspers, and a New Understanding of the Idea, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-349-49487-3.
  • Muesse, Mark (2013), The Age of the Sages: The Axial Age in Asia and the Near East (1st ed.), Minneapolis: Fortress Press, ISBN 978-0-8006-9921-5.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Daedalus (Spring 1975). 4:2: Wisdom, Revelation and Doubt: Perspectives on the First Millennium BCE. JSTOR i20024322.
  • Eisenstadt, Shmuel (1982), "The Axial Age: The Emergence of Transcendental Visions and the Rise of Clerics", European Journal of Sociology, 23 (2): 294–314, doi:10.1017/s0003975600003908, S2CID 146491719.
  • Baumard, Nicolas; Hyafil, Alexandre; Morris, Ian Matthew; Boyer, Pascal (2015), "Increased Affluence Explains the Emergence of Ascetic Wisdoms and Moralizing Religions", Current Biology, 25 (1): 10–15, Bibcode:2015CBio...25...10B, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.063, PMID 25496963, S2CID 44291.
  • Yves Lambert (1999). "Religion in Modernity as a New Axial Age: Secularization or New Religious Forms?". Oxford University Press: Sociology of Religion Vol. 60 No. 3. pp. 303–333. A general model of analysis of the relations between religion and modernity, where modernity is conceived as a new axial age.
  • Rodney Stark (2007). Discovering God: A New Look at the Origins of the Great Religions. New York: HarperOne.
  • Gore Vidal (1981). Creation. New York: Random House. A novel narrated by the fictional grandson of Zoroaster in 445 BCE, describing encounters with the central figures of the Axial Age during his travels.
  • Mark D. Whitaker (2009). Ecological Revolution: The Political Origins of Environmental Degradation and the Environmental Origins of Axial Religions; China, Japan, Europe Lambert. Dr. Whitaker's research received a grant award from the U.S. National Science Foundation in association with the American Sociological Association.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Axial_Age&oldid=1260670305"