Category talk:Roman towns and cities

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Classical Greece and Rome

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles

I notice fair disorder in naming, linking, referring to places with different names in Antiquity (as most of them had, of course). Is there a convention we should be adhering to?

Many towns are in the same place, yet there would be benefit in having separate articles. Ex.: Piacenza/Placentia.

Other towns, though even sharing the same name from Antiquity to our times, are not really the same place. To take one of the worst examples: ancient Capua = S. Maria di Capua Vetere; there is a modern Capua a few miles away, whose ancient name was Casilinum.

Yet others, the site is not known. Ex.: Volsinii (may have been Bolsena, may have been Orvieto: no one knows).

Help please?

Bill 19:19, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I think there should be a separate article for ancient name with cross-links with the modern city (if any). See Londinium / London. GreatWhiteNortherner 19:28, 2004 Sep 23 (UTC)

City ranks

The Romans had different categories or ranks of cities; this is something that should be covered here. I'm hunting for sources, but if anyone beats me to it, great. Dismalscholar (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]