User talk:Sage~enwiki

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 16:36, 27 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Edit warring at Euromaidan

[1].Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Euromaidan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

See the edit-warring report (permanent link). EdJohnston (talk) 14:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Be cautious when editing Eastern Europe topics

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

EdJohnston (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked on accusations of edit warring. But it is not I that was edit warring. The Euromaidan article deals in large part with the killing of numerous protestors around Kiev's Maidan square on February 20, 2014. The investigation into those responsible for the snipers is ongoing. I added a section detailiing the various comments by those in appropriate positions regarding responsibility for these acts. Many articles on Wikipedia - not just Euromaidan - had, directly or by direct implication, blamed government police forces for these killings. This has never been established as fact, and is indeed completely disputed. Unfortunately as most people know Wikipedia is full of ideoluges with agendas who do not want objective information on the site. They slander anyone who agrees with their agenda as engaged in "edit wars" or "point-of-view" or "soapbox" or all kinds of other accusations which have no bearing to reality. In this particular case, my accuser is the one that just deleted my changes without discussion. A discussion page was opened and I was contributing to it, but instead of working out this process, I have instead been blocked. Wikipedia is becoming a propaganda outlet for those who can hire the most people to form "groups" and ban anyone who disagrees with their ideological positions as "edit warring" or other made-up accusations. I want to appeal my ban.

Decline reason:

No, you were edit warring. If you don't know what that means, read WP:EDITWAR. This report] is entirely accurate. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sage~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The fact is Wikipedia has become a complete propaganda organ for the Soros' and other powerful oligarchs, NGOs and governments of the world. Groups of full-time paid individuals control all the important politically-related articles on the site, acting in collusion to make sure their "agenda" is the only one represented, and anyone going up against this is defeated by this "edit war" rule, since they can have numerous people censor opposing views and the person who is genuinely trying to make the article accurate and unbiased will always be overruled. The only way to combat such organized censorship is to mount a counter-organized censorship - this is what your "edit war" "rule" does. I've know this for some time but now it is finally clear, Wikipedia is a complete joke and there is no fixing it. I realize my complaint here won't change what Wikipedia is, so no need to respond.

Decline reason:

I'm just getting this out of the unblock request queue since this isn't really an unblock request. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just putting this out there, but if anyone knows where I can get paid for my edits, please drop me a line.--Львівське (говорити) 23:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

go away, nobody believes you, lieing shill. Sage (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Sage. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Sage~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 08:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above was possibly posted following edits at Ivermectin. An additional warning is that I will block Sage~enwiki if they repeat their edits at that article without first gaining consensus on the article talk page. Edit warring is not permitted. Johnuniq (talk) 09:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]