User talk:Delta G

Image:Pantothenic_acid.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Pantothenic_acid.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

I'm updating the page and want a newer-style image, if that works for you. crl620 03:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NMDA antagonists

Hi there! I noticed that you added Category:NMDA antagonists to a few relevant articles -- thanks! But NMDA has no antagonists, as it's just a simple molecule. What you no doubt meant was NMDA receptor antagonists. I snuck an "R" into the category name, so now we have Category:NMDAR antagonists, and I'm listing Category:NMDA antagonists on WP:CFD. Best, David Iberri | Talk 18:17, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Wow, that's surprising that one would be used as frequently as the other. If that's the case, then we should still prefer the proper scientific name over the less accurate one. But you're right, Category:NMDA antagonists should redirect to Category:NMDAR antagonists -- I was having trouble figuring out how to do this with categories (as I noticed that the "page move" feature didn't work with categories, I was a bit hesitant to do a redirect). --David Iberri | Talk 20:17, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Hmmm, I just tried to redirect from Category:NMDA antagonists using the standard #REDIRECT syntax, but that didn't do the job (it just shows "1. REDIRECT Category:NMDAR antagonists" when you view the category page). There's a question about category redirection at m:Help talk:Category#Category Redirection, but no answer's in sight. Also, from [1] I get the idea that category redirection still isn't implemented. If you have any ideas about a workaround, that'd be great! --David Iberri | Talk 20:38, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

I just did the Google searches for myself, just before you posted, and found the same thing. Incidentally a PubMed search for "NMDA receptor antagonist" wins out over "NMDA antagonist" by a large margin, so I think we're safe with Category:NMDA receptor antagonists. Thanks for the help. --David Iberri | Talk 20:57, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

STPP

In the future, rather than creating an article X that says "X stands for Y", create a redirect from X directly to Y. In the case of STPP, it was redirected to sodium tripolyphosphate with the markup #REDIRECT [[sodium tripolyphosphate]]. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:27, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

D-threose and D-erythrulose

Hi there, I don't suppose you could do me a favour and generate two images similar to D-erythrose Fischer.png?

The structures are at threose and erythrulose - I know that I ought to figure out how to do it myself, but I am getting too old to learn such new tricks.

Well done!

Schematic_diagram_of_the_human_eye

I just stumbled upon this great illustration: Image:Schematic_diagram_of_the_human_eye.png. It says created with Sodipodi. Could you upload an SVG version by any chance? --Dschwen 22:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aflatoxin_b1.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aflatoxin_b1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 05:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Delta G sandbox

I moved the page "Template:Delta G sandbox" to User:Delta G/Sandbox since user sandboxes normally are not located in template space. -- Suntag (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dihydroxyacetone Fischer b.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dihydroxyacetone Fischer b.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:D-mannose Fischer.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:D-mannose Fischer.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:Alpha-D-glucose 6-phosphate.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alpha-D-glucose 6-phosphate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File source problem with File:Glucose-6-phosphate.png

Thank you for uploading File:Glucose-6-phosphate.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:RuBP.png

Thank you for uploading File:RuBP.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lycopene.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lycopene.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 09:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ernest Duchesne.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ernest Duchesne.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyridoxine.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pyridoxine.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Venlafaxine.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Venlafaxine.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-erythrose Fischer.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:D-erythrose Fischer.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

File:Schematic diagram of the human eye.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Schematic diagram of the human eye.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 14:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]