This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Temperance and ProhibitionWikipedia:WikiProject Temperance and ProhibitionTemplate:WikiProject Temperance and ProhibitionTemperance and Prohibition articles
I added more about Sunday's relationship with the Klan, including a source about an incident in Bangor, Maine in 1927. There is some conflict since one of the references claims that he never praised the Klan but that was clearly not the case.--User:Namiba16:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article is full of overly-promotional language. It takes a more or less uncritical lens and seeks to put Sunday in the best possible light. I've tagged the article and I hope others will join me in rewriting this article with neutral language.--User:Namiba13:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You need to be specific and suggest alternatives for what you consider "overly-promotional," especially because this article has been rated GA. Twice actually. The GA rating was unsuccessfully challenged in 2009.23:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) John Foxe (talk) 23:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, "With his wife administering the campaign organization, Sunday was free to do what he did best: compose and deliver colloquial sermons." "Although he never lost his sympathy for the poor and sincerely tried to bridge the gulf between the races during the zenith of the Jim Crow era,[70] Sunday did receive contributions from members of the Second Ku Klux Klan during the 1920."--User:Namiba14:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those statements are adequately cited. At the very least you need to prove that they aren't. If you can improve the article do so, and I'll support you. But don't tag the article just because it's easy to do. John Foxe (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:WNTRMT, you should not remove maintenance tags when "There is ongoing activity or discussion related to the template issue." Please stop doing so until the NPOV issue has been resolved.--User:Namiba17:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Statements like those above indicate that better sources are needed. Dorset's book, published more than 30 years ago by a religious publishing house, needs to called into question as a definitive source. For example, there is an inherent contradiction between someone who "tried to bridge the gap between the races" and someone who was strongly favored by the Ku Klux Klan. Until this contradiction is adequately resolved in a neutral manner, the tags should remain.--User:Namiba18:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Find the appropriate source first. Don't say one should exist simply because you want to believe it must. Sunday both attempted to bridge the gap between races and was favored by the KKK. To deny that combination was impossible a hundred years ago, without evidence, reflects modern bias. You'll need to get into the weeds in Sunday biography if you want to improve this article. John Foxe (talk) 02:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Namiba, I removed the "do what he did best:" on the first sentence, which I think sounds less editorialized now. I'm not really seeing the problem with the second sentence. That we're getting inside Sunday's head too much in assuming that his apparent sympathy for the poor was genuine? ~Awilley (talk)04:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this article extensively relies on a 33-year old source from a religious publishing house to paint Sunday in the best possible light. The Dorset book is cited 41 times in the article. Relying on a potentially less than reliable source is part of the problem. A more recent scholarly source highlights Sunday's close relationship with the Klan more clearly.[1]--User:Namiba13:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
