Jump to content

User talk:Zashaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey Zasha, I don't know if you have the crcB RNA motif for one of your updates, but I have a couple of nice pictures for it, if you do plan on updating. Pjlmac (talk) 18:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Zashaw, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, nice work in the biology section. Cheers! --maveric149

Hiya, Zashaw!
Actually, believe it or not, I'm not actively following you around madly italicizing<g>, but species' names for some reason really bug me - my analyst says it's harmless. As for the method of italicization, my understanding was that wiki-style-markup is to be preferred to html-style-markup in cases where there's a choice. Of course, that may have changed, since I am now used to using it :) - or I may have been completely wrong in my understanding. At this point, sadly or not, I think '' can never stop being italic, since it's everywhere here! -- Someone else 05:26 Mar 22, 2003 (UTC)

I sit corrected. Thanks. Plus it's nice to know people follow me around :-) Zashaw 21:22 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
Following is so much easier when you sit still<G> -- Someone else 23:43 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)

Feh! Are not major works of sculpture italicized?<G>...actually, it may be so, but I wouldn't dream of it without consulting a style guide! Lipstick (Ascending) on a Caterpillar Tread was a most bizarre sculpture - controversial mostly because it was unabashedly phallic in a way alumnae tend to object to - so when I saw Claes crop up on recent changes I just HAD to add it... Sadly, I don't know where there's a copyright free photo of it. - Someone else 00:12, 30 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Re: bioinformatics on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#Nominations with unresolved objections, I have made some edits to the article in question which hopefully resolve some of your objections. Perhaps you may want to revisit this page. Cheers, --Lexor|Talk 03:30, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)


20/20 Cricket

[edit]

I came across your comment about the origin of the name 20/20, which you probably put on yonks ago and have probably forgot about now. At first I thought it was just somebody being a bit thick, which obviously int the case. Actually, this rather long-winded bit of nowt is just wondering how you got to the 20/20 page, as you don't seem to know owt about cricket. Or do you? Obviously, you have better things to do than answer this, but for some of us, cricket = life. Ta.--SquidSix (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks for answering, I shall now stop bothering you with inane queries. Bye. D.--SquidSix (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zashaw, I appreciate the way that you organize your "To Do" list. It turned out to be useful for me. Also, I agree with your proposed policy change, but we'll need to be careful about not overdoing links. AdamRetchless 04:33, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)

In response to your question on my talk page; I don't specifically work with RNA, tho I may have studied it a bit in classes and may have reason to work with it at some point. I'm basically a geneticist with an interest in evolution and development. AdamRetchless 23:50, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Featured Article Candidate: PaX

[edit]

Sorry, I struck your first objection myself due to a misreading of the rules :)

Anyway, check over your objections, and strike the rest if applicable. If not, post more indepth on what i should do.

Also, I can't smear things on PaX; but ExecShield and W^X came out after PaX, and are just immitating it. PaX is from late 2000, years before anything else even started up. I think ES is 1-2 years old, W^X is the same deal. PaX is approaching what, 4 years old? It's OLD.  :)

The ASLR it supplies is much more effective than the LLOR that W^X supplies. I don't think ES even supplies any kind of random placement of anything in virtual memory space, but I could be wrong.

I compared ES and PaX once on the LKML, based on Redhat's ES documents. I concluded that PaX was way better; it's most accurate to say that PaX is truly more mature than the others. The developer doesn't even seem to give half a damn what everyone else is doing; he's just trying to make PaX fast and secure. This is *exacly* what he should be doing :)

--Bluefox Phoenix Lucid 23:56, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

EDIT:

Wrote a section on this, by popular request. Can you withdraw your objections?

--John Moser 22:04, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Non-coding RNA: please use page move, not cut-and-paste

[edit]

Hi Zashaw, when you move an article (esp. with a long history like this one), please use move the page, rather than doing a cut-and-paste, otherwise the entire page history is lost. In situtations like this, where there already existed a REDIRECT, you need to ask a sysop (like me) to first delete the REDIRECT page (this is no loss because there was only three edits and all of them were creating/removing REDIRECTs). Also, as the page mover, it is your responsibility to fix all double redirects, and fix links to Main articles in other articles that reference this one (right now there are very few articles that actual reference the article directly, an indication of a major change). In short, please be a little careful before moving pages as it can have consequences which require fixing and should probably be done (for articles like this with a long history) after leaving a short message on the Talk page. I have done all of the above for now. Thanks. --Lexor|Talk 14:44, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Featured Article Candidate: Enigma machine

[edit]

I and some others (including yourself) have refactored Enigma machine per your recommendations on WP:FAC. What do you think of it now? Thanks. Johnleemk | Talk 12:52, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)


Existence of God merger

[edit]

I'm attempting to develop a consensus in favor of merging the Arguments against the existence of God and the Arguments for the existence of God articles. A beta version of the resulting article is available at Existence of God. To date, there seems to be consensus in favor of this merger on the "for" talk page, I'm now trying to get a consensus together on the "against" talk page. Please visit Talk:Arguments against the existence of God to weigh in. I'm copy-and-pasting this message to everybody who has contributed to that talk page. crazyeddie 05:49, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Failed Search Suggestion

[edit]

Hi, I saw your suggestion for "failed search" statistics to be compiled. I think this is a great idea, and have just suggested the same thing here. It would be a much more transparent method for getting people to write new pages, instead of always having to rely on the "requested pages" section. --Tomhannen 22:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RNA wikipedia project

[edit]

Hi Zasha,

I saw that you made an update to the PreQ riboswitch entry. You might be interested to know that we have started an RNA Project. It would be great if you signed up! We are really keen to improve the coverage of RNA biology in Wikipedia and get a good set of RNA families and elements included. Alexbateman 09:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Narayanese (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Cyano-1-RNA.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Myxobacteria edit

[edit]

Hi Zasha, I just put the 'also' in because of the statement directly prior to the one I wrote about Pxr. It says:

When nutrients are scarce, myxobacterial cells aggregate into fruiting bodies, a process long-thought to be mediated by chemotaxis but now considered to be a function of a form of contact-mediated signaling.

I had a quick browse over the references cited for this statement and the abstracts state 'contact-mediated cell-cell communication' and 'attractive chemotaxis' are causal agents of fruiting body formation (abstract). But if Pxr regulates fruiting body formation at a higher level than these mechanistic explanations then maybe the first couple of sentences of that section need rewriting? It doesn't read very well at the moment. Thanks, Jebus989★ 13:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're a star!

[edit]
The Bio-star
For your epic contributions of content related to RNA, particularly riboswitches. --Paul (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:Actino-pnp-RNA.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Zashaw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Zashaw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Zashaw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sRNA

[edit]

Hello Zashaw. Several articles contain the phrase likely function in trans as sRNAs. sRNA redirects to a disambiguation page, so I'd like to fix these links but I don't have the technical knowledge. Does sRNA here mean small RNA, soluble RNA (i.e transfer RNA) or something else? Thanks, Certes (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Certes, thanks for noticing this. It should go to small RNA. I'll make that change in my future edits. Zashaw (talk) 09:06, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I've fixed the existing articles. Certes (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Zashaw (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve FuFi-1 RNA motif

[edit]

Hi, I'm Strikerforce. Zashaw, thanks for creating FuFi-1 RNA motif!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article currently only has one inline citation and reference. Please consider adding additional reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

StrikerforceTalk 14:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GlnA RNA motif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genetic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Zashaw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Drum RNA motif for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drum RNA motif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drum RNA motif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 02:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Hundreds of RNA motif pages. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 04:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif

[edit]
Notice

The article Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBIOL and WP:GNG. No source besides one paper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hongsy (talk) 03:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IMPDH RNA motif

[edit]
Notice

The article IMPDH RNA motif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBIOL and WP:GNG. No source besides one paper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hongsy (talk) 03:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betaproteobacteria-1 RNA motif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hongsy (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IMPDH RNA motif for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IMPDH RNA motif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMPDH RNA motif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hongsy (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zashaw&oldid=1184234179"