User talk:Omnieiunium
Standard Welcomes
[edit]Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. File:Banghead.gif → JarlaxleArtemis 04:14, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Welcome Omnie, (the below is the standard welcome note)
Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:
- First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
- When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
- Remember to use a neutral point of view!
- If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
Best of luck, and have fun!
WB 02:04, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
Bad links deletion
[edit]I've been working on the bad links section and I was wondering, do we want to continue to strike through the complete articles? Or can we delete the ones that have been done? I think the deletion of the actual completely fixed link would be a lot easier, but what do you think? --Omnieiunium 03:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- I totally agree, and I've added a note in support of your comments at Wikipedia talk:Bad links/spacing. Feel free to be bold and sweep those finished lines away at your leisure. -- Beland 04:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Historical BC ridings in Okanagan
[edit]Hi. I saw your signup to the Electoral Districts project and that you're in the Okanagan and have volunteered for the Liberals; I guess I don't have to tell you to be wary of using Wikipedia for campaign purposes; contributions on the history of the riding and its social/ethnic/economic makeup would of course be welcome, as well as BALANCED profiles on current candidates. Needless to say most people around Wikipedia are partisan and necessarily so; people interested in information-generation/research are inherently opinionated and if they didn't have political opinions/positions there'd be "something wrong". Even arch-neutrality, like atheism, is a position/belief, after all. Anyway, that being said, I've just spent an interesting couple of weeks analyzing/transcribing the historical provincial ridings and some of the federal ones; and as a result there's candidate/MLA profiles all over the place that need doing. I've been able to do some in the area I know (Lillooet) but there's a whole long tradition in the Okanagan, and certain MLAs, that it looks like there should be articles on; e.g. Kenneth Cattanach MacDonald in North Okanagan or Thomas King in Columbia/Columbia-Revelstoke (I think that was his riding); anyway, I suspect you know a lot more about these guys than I ever could compile from reading up on the various histories I have around here; I've been having the darnedest time with the 19th Century politicians as it is (and we think our system NOW is a mess...); and can also hopefully contribute something on the "political culture" of the Okanagan and its (supposed, according to academia) roots in the British orcharding/ranching gentry of the early 20th Century. My profiles of John Andrew Mara and Forbes George Vernon were "winged" based on Canadian Biography Online and could use some dressing up; I know Mara has quite the history, and a sensational divorce too IIRC....or was it an open mistress?
Best of the season; just saying hello and hope that the outline of BC electoral history I've put in place (see List of British Columbia general elections and follow the links) is of use to others, who will do what I cannot in "filling in the blanks" (blanks=red wikilinks).Skookum1 02:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Um... Copy?
[edit]Um... Did you copy my userbox design? haha. -- WB 03:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- By FSM, I would never copy anything!!! Glad to see you fixed the text box for IE --Omnieiunium 06:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- FSM! haha. -- WB 00:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Template:CanElec1
[edit]More information is always a good thing, but adding empty columns to hundreds of tables is less useful. Thus the best idea is to create new tempaltes, and a user who wants to add more information can easily switch from the basic to CanElec1 to an expanded version. There already exists Template:CanElec2 and Template:CanElec3, which are both somewhat larger versions of CanElec1. - SimonP 00:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- CanElec4 is good, keeping the names similar makes it very easy to switch from one template to the other. Easy switching also means that the data has to be arranged in the same manner, so that a switch from CanElec1 to CanElec4 will simply add extra columns, and not scramble the information. Your templates also look very good, with a better colour scheme than the existing ones. It's a good idea to keep the style of each election template the same, so you if you do implement your ideas it might be a good idea to change the colour scheme of the existing three templates as well. - SimonP 00:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Enjoy!
[edit]Enjoy your new user page. haha. -- WB 00:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Election templates
[edit]Yeah, I wasn't sure where to put their residences, and I thought it was an interesting fact to have. If I see any errors, I'll fix them as far as the colspan goes :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Userbox
[edit]It's probably a bad idea to make more of those userboxes. Especially when almost nobody will use it (referring to the FSM admin). Just subst it when you make it. -- WB 08:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
I found it in the Vancouver book, its at the back of the reference section, middle of the row bottom shelf (of course now I've lost my list of photocopies of the history, but everything is in there (in the article) so I guess it doesn't matter -- Tawker 01:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gbdvd.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Gbdvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of West Vancouver Secondary School
[edit]Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ben Ben (talk) 03:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CanElec5
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:CanElec5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CanElec5-by
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:CanElec5-by requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)