Talk:SaGa

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Now that there is an English article on SaGa Frontier 2, is the link to the Japanese article needed? I will delete it for now. Y0u 04:54, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup needed

There is clearly some disorganization and bias present in the article, so I tagged it for cleanup. Paragon 20:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SaGa series (japanese name)

About "SaGa (サガシリーズ, SaGa?) is a series of computer role-playing games".

"サガシリーズ" means literally "SaGa series" in Japanese, not just "SaGa". It might be more proper to write just "サガ" (SaGa) inside the brackets.

However, while the Japanese often rewrite foreign words in game titles using katakana characters, the SaGa games don't feature SaGa in their title written as "サガ" but as "Sa•Ga".

I would recommend: "SaGa (Sa•Ga, サガ) is a series of computer role-playing games".

Concerning Unlimited Saga

The article states that Unlimited Saga is the final game, but there is no source. Is it really the final game, or is it just the last game made (not including remakes)? Rogutaan 01:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Tomomi Kobayashi be merged into SaGa (series). She is a part of the series, but I do not think there is enough notability on her to warrant her own article. Please discuss below as to whether you support or oppose the merger. MuZemike 17:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and done the merge as no one has commented within the past two weeks. MuZemike 18:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SaGa Chronicle

Apparently some sort of SaGa series bible has been released recently: [1]. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 16:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ref(s)

Saga 20th anniversary 4gamer

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SaGa (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://fs.finalfantasytr.com/companies.asp?cid=184

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SaGa Scarlet sources

Here's some sources for an article concerning SaGa: Scarlet Grace should anyone - myself included - decide to create one. All in Japanese, but hey it's better than nothing.

--ProtoDrake (talk) 13:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General sources

Okay, here's some general sources. The anniversary interviews and VG247 interview above also count.

Gpara interview (archived)

--ProtoDrake (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More, specific to Imperial Saga

--ProtoDrake (talk) 11:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested with a hatnote added to this article. Dekimasuよ! 19:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SaGa (series) → SaGa – WP:TWODABS situation. Obvious primary topic. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support the first game in the series is far better known as The Final Fantasy Legend in the Western World and I doubt that there are many people misspelling Saga in such a manor.--67.68.210.105 (talk) 03:04, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

New series entry

There's another mobile entry, that to my knowledge will be localized to English in 2020. Romancing SaGa Re;univerSe. Considering how well-kept and complete the series has been documented (even mobile titles like Emperor & Imperial SaGa), are there plans to add a page for this one?

Tonelico (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]