Talk:Language Construction Kit

Do we really need the stub message here? This article can't be expanded much from its current state without copying the whole bleeding thing here. - Cymydog Naakka 20:56, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

There are several other Language Construction Sites that are loose kits. To put the entire category under one person's name is irresponsible. It would be like putting the Internet under Al Gore's page. After all, he "invented it". Alphabeter 01:07, 19 Dec 2005 (CST)

Agreed. I've just added two similar resources. --IJzeren Jan _{In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij} 07:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this article needs to exist at all. I think the kits should be listed under the "How to" section in "External Links" in Constructed language. (Perhaps "How to" should be renamed "Language Construction Kits"?) The features of Mark Rosenfelder's particular kit should be placed in his article. --Gavin 05:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with Gavin. It looks like free advertisement, this goes also for Mark Rosenfelder's BB. Both these articles do not seem to be encyclopedic subjects, while the Mark Rosenfelder indeed is. Presently one must look at three different wiki articles to get an idea of who he is and what he does, and yet the informtion is quite incomplete. Is he young or old? What did he study, where, who were his mentors, his intellectual influences? What does he do now? etc. Vale, Lcgarcia 15:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree except for the "free advertisement". Does he pfit from this? Did he actually post this? No and no. On the actual subject under discussion, yes, maybe it should be put under "External Links" Krinnen