Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine nee

Sunshine nee was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Notable? I think not. [[User:Mike Storm|Mike ∞Storm]] 18:57, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

ex-Asian eh? I wonder whether the sun shines out of... oh never mind, delete or I write an article on Moonlight Pocket, the former Antipodean star of Kangaroos Down Under 43 and Castlemaine XXXX. --Ianb 21:05, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I agree - Delete. Deb 21:45, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Ex-Asian? You can take the girl out of the country, but you can't take the country out of the girl? Delete: completely non-notable. Even for a porn star, this is a tremendously small, eh, body of work. (Delete porn stars unless they're notable for some other reason, and especially delete even more new porn stars.) Geogre 21:55, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep. She has an entry on IMDb. RickK 04:34, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: here: [1]. For information: does an IMDb entry automatically infer notability? --Ianb 07:16, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- The person who made the coffee for a straight to video film could probably get an entry on IMDB. Doesn't make them notable in their own right. Average Earthman 12:19, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  - quite. Wikipedia doesn't need to mirror every IMDB entry... --Ianb 12:33, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    - She made 14 movies. Rick K 18:39, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
- RickK, porno starlets make a lot of movies. All I could find was three, but she probably made another eleven in the day since I wrote that. That's why I said she had a remarkably small body of work (smirks aside). The ephemeral nature of the careers in adult films is such that starlets can make 100 films and be forgotten in a year. I don't want to start saying that things have be notable for X time before they're in, but in some cases the very small viewership and prolixity of production argue that numbers of films just aren't going to be accurate measurements of notability. Geogre 19:02, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  - OK, I don't really have any axe to grind here, it's no big deal to me, one way or the other, except that we've kept other vanity articles solely on the basis of one or two entries in IMDb obviously written by the same contributor. We should be consistent. Rick K 19:22, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. DJ Clayworth 19:47, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep. --Dittaeva 21:53, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Andris 14:18, Aug 16, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.