User talk:Calmypal

Old discussions: November 6, 2003 - March 12, 2005

Presidents template

Nope...no hard feelings at all. I'm glad it worked out nicely at the end. :) --Ji ang 09:44, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Little Hitler"

I notice you added this sentence to the Hitler (disambiguation) page under the "Little Hitler" section: "A court ruling has made this insult criminal in Alabama". Do you have a source for that? I couldn't find anything on google, and it seems blatantly unconstitutional to me. -R. fiend 13:55, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Help

Calling for backup. Help save List of incidents famously considered great blunders. A wonderfully useful article and the subject of a number of books and documentaries. Viciously attacked by deletionists. It does have a few supporters, but our voices are being drowned out. Please help save this article! - Pioneer-12 07:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

THANK YOU!!!

Your noticing the wiki origin of the one article prevented me from making a copvio entry (well for more than a couple minutes) on something else. I realllly hate fine print at the bottom of articles now... =)

Pournell Chart

Pournelle Chart

I know you're an inclusionist, so help us save the Pournelle Chart article at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Pournelle_Chart.

Emperor

You say that you're the emperor, eh? Well, then it must be so! Jaberwocky6669 June 28, 2005 23:25 (UTC)

Important VFD

Please see the VFD for commons:List of victims of the 1913 Great Lakes storm. This is of vital importance. This list and others like it are being pushed off of the entire Wikimedia project. It started at Wikipedia, where they were VFDd in favor of moving to Wikisource/Commons. Now they are being VFDd off Wikisource (they don't really belong there, since they are not original source texts), with people there saying they should be on WP/Commons, and it is also being VFDd on Commons, where people don't realize that Commons accepts texts (says so right on the Main Page). This will set a precedent for any user-created lists. -- BRIAN0918 22:48, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorization

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/New Jersey page as living in or being associated with New Jersey. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in New Jersey for instructions. Al 15:36, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

It's Eszett, LOL.

I sign your talk page. Now I'm going to cook an egg for breakfast. eszett ^talk 10:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Doug-forrester2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Doug-forrester2.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image copyright problem with Image:FriesianPoliticalSpectrum.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:FriesianPoliticalSpectrum.PNG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

George Allen

Before you expend all the effort to redo all the llnks, perhaps we should encourage a discussion on the topic of the proper name for the article, this will need to be done eventually, why not do it this week? I left a note on the article's talk page to start things off. I have no personal attachment to any article name, but I don't want people to have to go through a disambiguation page, or double redirects if this is the one person of this name most are searching for. Cheers, NoSeptember ^talk 00:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Da Vinci Code

Hi! Thanks for your edits at The Da Vinci Code - you seem to be re-adding material that was specifically split out to other articles in order to maintain the focus and size of this article. Your criticism trivia is covered at Criticisms of The Da Vinci Code in greater detail. Details about the movie are covered at The Da Vinci Code (film). Both of those "sub" articles are mentioned and linked to already. Are you proposing merging those sub-articles back into the primary one? Kuru ^talk 01:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gay vs. homosexual

Thank you for taking an interest in bettering the quality of LGBT articles. I am altering your "fix" of renaming "gay" to "homosexual" in some cases due to accuracy issues and common usage concerns. - Davodd 00:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal on Notability

Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Wikipedia:Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Wikipedia:Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. Make sure this is defeated! --Ephilei 22:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BrubeckQuartet.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BrubeckQuartet.JPG. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

adequacy.org

You might try the Wayback Machine to get a feel for this defunct website. The WP page apparently existed for four years before the AFD process. I suggest that you appeal the AFD for reinstatement of the page. --Ancheta Wis 06:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Ancheta Wis 10:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of How to keep an idiot busy for hours

An editor has nominated How to keep an idiot busy for hours, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to keep an idiot busy for hours and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Ng.j 18:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pretzel Logic album.jpg

Hello Calmypal, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pretzel Logic album.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Calmypal/Images. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DickParry.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:DickParry.PNG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 20:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Allan Poe

Hello! I noticed your user page mentions you are a fan of Edgar Allan Poe. I'm starting up a Poe Portal and I'm looking for support/feedback. If you're interested, the portal also has a list of high priority Poe projects I'm looking for help on. Many thanks! --Midnightdreary 17:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

look Calmypal

I need to talk to you about a matter that has very little to do with Wikipedia. Get onto AIM and message me. eszett ^talk 23:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The First 20 Million Is Always the Hardest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The First 20 Million Is Always the Hardest.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Pinkfloyd-vegman.ogg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Pinkfloyd-vegman.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. kotra (talk) 02:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pinkfloyd-vegman.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinkfloyd-vegman.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:NixonResignationLetter.gif

A tag has been placed on Image:NixonResignationLetter.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:NixonResignationLetter.gif|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answer for blue and white fly catcher

Hi, I am seeking an answer for my pet bird fly catcher that its' leg craw is bend backward. Can it be cure or what should I do.

ghui —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.12.227 (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to One Fish, Two Fish, Blowfish, Blue Fish. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Black Sabbath - War Pigs.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Black Sabbath - War Pigs.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Little Richard - Good Golly Miss Molly.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Little Richard - Good Golly Miss Molly.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Martha and the Vandellas - Nowhere to Run.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Martha and the Vandellas - Nowhere to Run.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of How to keep an idiot busy for hours for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How to keep an idiot busy for hours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to keep an idiot busy for hours (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of all people living and dead listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of all people living and dead. Since you had some involvement with the List of all people living and dead redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk 20:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Communists for Kerry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Communists for Kerry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communists for Kerry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Anome (talk) 23:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Communists for Kerry concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Communists for Kerry, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]