User talk:VanishedUser 390318

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Previous discussions (all times UTC)
2006-01-24 15:10 • 2006-07-25 21:28 • 2007-04-10 17:01
2007-06-27 16:20 • 2008-03-04 23:23 • 2009-12-15 01:07

Wikipedia:COMMON listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:COMMON. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:COMMON redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Marcus Qwertyus 19:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Invision Power Board for deletion

The article Invision Power Board is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invision Power Board until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Merrill Stubing (talk) 21:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delisting (Canadian medicare) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delisting (Canadian medicare) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delisting (Canadian medicare) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 13:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simoleon

The article Simoleon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no articles that warrant inclusion in this disambiguation page; all the ones included at present are WP:DABNOT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —me_and 11:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:System Folder open.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:System Folder open.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Carol icon.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Carol icon.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asok (Dilbert) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asok (Dilbert) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asok (Dilbert) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox District Taiwan (ROC)

Template:Infobox District Taiwan (ROC) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:STABLE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:STABLE. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:STABLE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 16:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ransom Love for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ransom Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ransom Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nathan^T 19:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

8D8 (Atedeate) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 8D8 (Atedeate). Since you had some involvement with the 8D8 (Atedeate) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 17:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Periodic tables key

Template:Periodic tables key has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Basilisk II

The article Basilisk II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Woodroar (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blinkenlights Archaeological Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blinkenlights Archaeological Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blinkenlights Archaeological Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 00:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pledge drive

The article Pledge drive has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is not notable. Telethon already exists, and any information this article has that Telethon does not have can be merged there. This article reads more like a dictionary term, and most of its claims (which can be moved to the Telethon article) are not cited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spongeworthy93 (talk) 00:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Invision Community for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Invision Community is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invision Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

◇HelenDegenerate◆ 01:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blinkenlights (disambiguation)

The article Blinkenlights (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ONEOTHER. Hatnote exists in the primary topic. No expansion in months.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 15:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]