Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleh
Article Bleh listed on WP:VFD Apr 26 to May 3 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:
An orphaned and at best mediocre dictionary definition of a meaningless term. I'd replace this with a real article if only I could imagine a use for it. TB 08:33, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- delete. Weird. Sander123 11:15, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Weird is right. It comes across as a "shaggy dog" joke dicdef. The phonetics get points for cleverness, but this should still be deleted. - Lucky 6.9 14:44, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Move to wiktionary. I have used this word sometimes. It can also mean ugh or ha"! Krik 14:49, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I would have liked to have had the chance to read this. Smerdis of Tlön 15:28, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I have restored it so that it can go through the vfd process. -- Graham :) | Talk 16:08, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now delete it. I had hoped the phonetics business might have something to save in it; alas! :) Smerdis of Tlön 16:49, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I have restored it so that it can go through the vfd process. -- Graham :) | Talk 16:08, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Not good enough even for wiktionary, delete. -- Graham :) | Talk 16:08, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-referential. Isomorphic 22:24, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- delete, but maybe add the alternative bleh, to the blah page? it's in fairly common usage. Brendanfox 21:17, 1 May 2004
End discussion