Talk:Chamizal dispute

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

So, just how was the dispute resolved.

It occurred on a visit between John F. Kennedy and the president of Mexico. --Ancheta Wis 12:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Mexico or the United States may be able to help!

And see http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/252-a-river-runs-through-it-the-chamizal-dispute-1895-1963/

The subject would be so much clearer, with the addition of 5 or 6 additional maps, with different colors for Mexico, US, river, and disputed territory

1) 1852 map

2) 1864 map

3) 1868 map?

4) 1910 map

5) 1963 map

Can anyone with sufficient knowledge on the subject please help? --Lacarids (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three bridges?

Which of the four present bridges in downtown El Paso was not built in the 1960s? --NE2 05:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Text and map are contradictory

The article says the river gradually moved southward, but the accompanying map shows the river to have moved northward. Given this contradiction, it is hard to figure out the geography of the dispute, or to make sense of the American and Mexican positions in the negotiations.MayerG (talk) 04:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final improvements to be made

This has become an excellent little article! The last paragraph, on resolution, has some contradictions and inconsistent chronologies (Johnson met Lopez-Mateos in '64, but when? And why is this mentioned before the congressional legislation passed in '63?) Since the sources cited are not on the internet, they are difficult to verify. --Neopeius (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]