Talk:Feigned madness

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 November 2004. The result of the discussion was keep.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

For a November 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Feigned madness

There's a mismatch here between the title and the content of this article. The title is very broad, while the article itself is quite specific. If the article is going to be about the general idea of faking insanity, what will be covered that isn't already in Insanity defense? Joyous 01:07, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Neutrality of comment

In the section "To examine the system from the inside" Nellie Bly is described as "American muckraker Nellie Bly", while the article on Nellie Bly describes her as an early feminist and investigative journalist. I believe the muckraker comment is biased and needs removal but didn't want to make the change without discussion as I am rarely involved in editing Wikipedia.

Lyrrad1864 (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The term "muckraker" was acknowledged at the time as a badge of honor and continues to be so. Upton Sinclair is another example. No need to change this appropriate adjective. Ricegator (talk) 06:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except that's a reason why it could be wrong. No editorializing - we try to use non-judgemental language here. Whether the judgement would be supportive or condemning, we try not to do that on Wikipedia. 130.105.213.232 (talk) 12:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]