Talk:MCI Communications

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

TOR Hack

The recent FBI raid on freedom hosting contained javascript that pinged an IP owned by MCI communications — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.108.20 (talk) 14:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate logo

I noticed that the corporate logo was recently changed.[1] The concern I have is that it changed the logo used most recently (the star burst logo) with an older logo. I have some old pay stubs from 1997 that use the MCI star burst logo, so the logo was used prior to the Worldcom merger. Does anyone have the date the logo was changed so that we can show both with appropriate dates in the image description? --Allen3 ^talk 19:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MCI Communications and Verizon

Based upon recent edits there appears to be some confusion about MCI Communications being a part of Verizon. There was never any direct link between the two due to the fact that MCI Communications ceased to exist in 1998 when the company was acquired by WorldCom and Verizon not being formed until 2000 with the Bell Atlantic purchase of GTE. --Allen3 ^talk 14:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs to explain the status of MCI today, including the relationship with Verizon. Certainly this statement in the opening paragraph is incorrect: "The MCI name disappeared in January 2006 after the company was bought by Verizon." All you have to do is navigate to mci.com to see that that's dead-wrong. (And you'll notice the Verizon logo right on the front page of the MCI site.)--74.103.157.38 (talk) 23:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Telephone numbers

I added this article to the Telephone Numbers category as a result of the lengthy discussion of various vanity toll-free numbers --TMH (talk) 00:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Do we really need two separate articles about MCI? WorldCom wasn't even that well known until they bought the original MCI. There's a way we can integrate the history of the two companies into one article. Jgera5 (talk) 16:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a good idea, but, wow, nearly 2 years and no talk page activity about it? ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 18:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the artciles should be combined. MCI Communications had a long a rich history from its founding in 1963 until it was acquired by WorldCom in 1998 and this history should be preserved in its own article. If you combine the MCIC article with the MCI Inc. article it will be even more difficult than it already is to understand the role of MCI and WorldCom back when they were each competitors in the telecommunications space. Full disclosure, I worked for MCIC from 1984 until 1995. I hope to start working on these articles in the not to distant future. FFM784 (talk) 14:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with the "not combining" discussion. Two completely different companies with divergent cultures and strategies that enmeshed together would lose the flavor and confuse the narrative. That is apropos to combining AT&T and Verizon because they were at one point all under the original AT&T. Nonsensical. Augustspecht (talk) 11:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per FFM784. BlueSalix (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Impactful legislation

The "impactful legislation" section is not impartial - it has a clear point of view that the 1996 Telecommunications Act was bad for the telecom sector. VTBassMatt (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MCI Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420212024/http://www.hagley.org/library/exhibits/Mci/index.html to http://www.hagley.org/library/exhibits/Mci/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1967 FCC recommendation v. decision

As of 2017-08-30, the "Founding" section includes, "Hearings on Microwave Communications' initial application between February 13, 1967 and April 19, 1967 resulted in a recommendation that the FCC approve MCI's application." This resulted in a "recommendation". What about the actual implementation? I assume that took place in the same year, but it seems different from a mere "recommendation". I would like to see this point clarified, e.g., by someone with access to the primary reference, Cantelon, Philip L. (1993). The History of MCI: 1968–1988, The Early Years. Dallas: Heritage Press. LCC HE8864.M375C36 1993.. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]