Talk:Stratus VOS

This page was proposed for deletion by be..anyone (talk · contribs) on 26 April 2015 with the comment:
not notable product
It was contested by DonaldET3 (talk · contribs) on 2015-04-28 with the comment:
one of the few remaining Multics-like platforms […] example of fully lock-stepped computing

Computing: Software / Security Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Rewrite

I've rewritten this page - with about 6 years experience as a Stratus sysadmin, I hope it's more informative and better structured now. If there are any subject topics which I've missed, pls leave a note here as I'll be checking back periodically.

Sean O'Casaidhe

The input is welcome - I'm sure that someone will sort out the style :-) Sittingduck123 11:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FTX

This sentence is structured in such a way to imply that its points to an operating system's article. If you follow the link, you will realise that FTX is not an operating system. Obviously something is wrong. "Stratus later introduced a Unix-compatible operating system called FTX."

===FTX is a UNIX-derived OS which does not seem to be available anymore in the Stratus product lineup. According to the comp.sys.stratus FAQ <QUOTE> On the Unix side of the house, a frequent question is, "How different is FTX from other versions of Unix?" I'm not an FTX expert, but the short answer is that FTX is derived from the AT&T System V Release 4 code, with some kernel modifications and a few enhanced features, such as symmetric multiprocessing. From the user's point of view, it should perform like any well behaved Unix, unless you ask it to do something Berkelish. (In general, in the Unix world, BSD releases are increasingly eclipsed by SVR4-flavor variants, which include Solaris 2.x, IRIX, and HP/UX. Even Linux is more like SVR4 than BSD.) </QUOTE>

Sean O'Casaidhe

Layout

The article could use a few subsections -- I can't see good places to put them though, without having two page sections.

The following topics deserve discussion:

Terminal handling (the very cooked input, cooked output, "--PAUSE--")
Applications for VOS (Samba, Gnu tools and Perl deserve mention)
Link to http://ftp.stratus.com/ (and maybe http://www.stratus.com/ ... maybe)
Portability (s$, e$, compiler extensions) and interoperability (FTP server funnies)
Screen shot of form completion ...

The following topics deserve discussion:

Performance (is this system slow, or is it just me)
What is it typically used for?

Sittingduck123 12:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

Sections now exist - pls feel free to input anything relevant that I haven't. I haven't used POSIX.1 applications (which include Samba, Gnu tools & Perl) so I'm not writing anything about them. Performance depends on a LOT of factors, check http://www.banbottlenecks.com for white papers on improving throughput. I know that I've experienced truly awesome throughput on a Continuum 1200.

Sean O'Casaidhe

August 2011

I've updated some stale links and added references to OpenVOS. I also updated the POSIX / open-source information and the list of open-source products. More work remains.

Stratuspaulg (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

The Stratus VOS article should not be deleted. There are six mainframe manufacturers on Earth. Only Stratus mainframes are fully lockstepped, and Stratus mainframes run VOS. There are hundreds of companies using VOS around the world. Though the usage of VOS may be invisible to most people, it is significant. Also, VOS is the only extant descendant of Multics that I know of. DonaldET3 (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the notability box, I had the same impression. Unfortunately there are a lot of editors who see fit to roam around subjects which they are unfamiliar deleting them or cajoling in that direction. Hopefully, this article should survive. prat (talk) 01:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stratus VOS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]