User talk:Kjd

Well, from here, here and here, I think it is obvious as can be. And maybe I am wrong, I'm not so sure anymore...—Vitriden 02:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, I've replied to you and you didn't reply to me. You've just asked these articles to be deleted, without listening to the arguments. That makes me feel like an idiot, you know.--Vitriden 03:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have written a long answer and then accidentaly deleted it, so I'm not in the best mood right now. Shortly, on the CcTLD#ccTLDs_not_in_ISO_3166-1, there is not a single exception to the rule, so, since SP and ME are anounced to be alpha-2 codes for Serbia and Montenegro, really can't see how can anyone discuss anything in Montenegro on the issue.--Vitriden 13:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD

You nominated .sp for speedy deletion, the criteria that you put as your reason for deletion are not speedy criteria. I deleted under CSD A7. I hope this helps you for future tagging! Cheers!!! —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QF @ LAX

It is long-established consensus of Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports members that we do not list techstops or "illegal" destinations that cannot be purchased. It is not even a "domestic ticketing" policy - doesn't matter where you're from, you can't buy a ticket on Qantas to fly from LAX to JFK. They won't let you do it. As for it being on departure boards, that's rather irrelevant. We don't list many destinations that are shown on departure boards, such as domestic through-hub direct services. If you'd like to discuss changing our current consensus, I suggest you start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports. Thanks. FCYTravis 00:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RNIDS (.rs ccTLD)

You have an answer at Talk:.rs --Stevanb 22:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duncraig

Thanks for your contribution. Any ideas what could be photographed in Duncraig that could provide a representative shot of the suburb? These residential suburbs are always a challenge. Orderinchaos78 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vrsn-end-of-zone-marker-dummy-record.root

In what way do you consider the listing of the response to a DNS query of this "domain name" to be nonsense? That's what is returned in the text (at least with certain server/client combinations, including mine) when you dig or nslookup the name. The return text may seem nonsensical, but the fact that it exists isn't. That section of the entry needed serious cleanup, but neither does that make it nonsense. Paul.w.bennett 18:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AuDA.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AuDA.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:CENTR members

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]