This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is clearly written by someone thoroughly unfamiliar with the actual content of Mr. Gothard's teachings. I've heard and read what he teaches, and it's just plain not represented accurately in this article. Claims such as his teaching of "male superiority," or the implication that he essentially teaches retribution for stepping out of line, or that he identifies toys as idols, or other clumsy misportrayals of the "basic life principles," strongly suggest that this article was hastily compiled from openly critical third-party material full of intentional misquotes, without any attempt to corroborate objectively against Mr. Gothard's own words or sources.
In short, this article is, in its current state, mere propaganda. It should be flagged as questionable in veracity until such time as someone of greater journalistic integrity takes it upon themselves to update it. 47.200.20.97 (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OP is clearly a Gothard zealot, if not Gothard himself. I noticed they didn't provide proof to the contrary, but merely went on an unhinged rant in an attempt to emotionally manipulate anyone who would otherwise disagree. 209.6.200.92 (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a Gothard supporter in any way - but most major Evangelical teachers such as John F. MacArthur, John Piper, RC Sproul (deceased) would hold to a Complementarianism view as Gothard seemed to hold to. None of their articles would state them as believing in "male superiority" and the person who asserts such seems to have no understanding of Complementarianism and would benefit from reading the Wikipedia article on the subject - which clearly states that women "are held to be equal in moral value and of equal status". I understand many many not agree with that position, but why is Gothard treated with pejorative language, and others like MacArthur are said to have " a complementarian view on gender roles"? I would suggest a change to use similar language for Gothard.24.128.180.93 (talk) Mateck (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 23:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article should state he CLAIMS to be a Christian minister. He IS NOT someone who practices Christianity rather his religion is a made up theology borrowing heavily from Christianity. What he and his followers have developed is very much a cult-practicing coercion, manipulation and control. Calling him a Christian minister is quite deceiving and quite wrong. Londonequus (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The ISBN numbers on this page have been an issue for many years. It looks as if Gothard acquired a range of 100 ISBNs at some point, but reuses them.
https://search.worldcat.org/search?qt=wikipedia&q=isbn%3A0916888053 for example shows a bunch of books, and not How to Evaluate Music. It's used for more than one item in the bibliography here.
.svg){kind=small}
