Talk:David Livingstone

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Africa: Zambia Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia (assessed as Top-importance).

Scotland High‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Reformed Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 10, 2008, November 10, 2009, November 10, 2010, November 10, 2013, and November 10, 2014.

David Livingstone and His Convert Sechele

Lake Victoria

Wasn't Lake Victoria the source of the Nile? Why did I find Lake Victoria, and then a few years later start looking for the source of the Nile? Is the article wrong? Or did Livingstone not know that he had already found it? --dave

As I recall, he (and numerous others) thought/hoped that Lake Victoria was just yet another intermediate source. They were looking for the source of Lake Victoria (and hence the Nile), or else to discover that Lake Victoria flowed into something else, not the Nile, and that the "real" source would be something different. (Everybody wanted to be the man who discovered the ultimate source. Great kudos in that. Speke had already done it by then, but no-one really knew it for sure, and everyone was still arguing.)

If I remember correctly, it wasn't until several years after Livingstone's death that the Bakers finally travelled all the way up the Nile from Egypt to Lake Victoria and finally proved it beyond all reasonable doubt. But it's been 15 years or so since I last read this stuff, so don't take anything above as gospel! I'd have to check. Tannin

Interesting, thanks! --Dave

The Bakers only got to Lake Albert, although that was interesting because nobody had suspected its existence. Stanley was the one who filled in the remaining mysteries, which included showing that the Lualaba was in the Congo watershed and did not connect to the Nile anywhere. Stan 08:32 Mar 9, 2003 (UTC)

No mention of missionary work

This article is surprising in that it discusses the biography of a well-known Christian missionary, who repeatedly categorized his endeavors as being religiously motivated, yet hardly a word is spared for his missionary endeavors. The apparent exclusion of his missionary focus robs the article of context that would be useful in an understanding of his life and motivation. It may be the subjective opinion of the authors that his political and economic efforts were more notable, but certainly in his opinion and writings, he placed more emphasis on his proselytization. An article on his life should be expected to place proportionate emphasis on major events in his missionary career, as well as his accomplishments as an explorer. Oddly enough, his failures (real or alleged) seem to be highlighted more than his successes.I am related to him. 81.159.89.126 (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC) . I am related to him too. 76.216.149.166 (talk) 07:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Livingstone's missionary work was insignificant, and estimates for the number of people he converted to Christianity range between 1 and zero. The article does mention that the London Missionary Society dropped him, because he subordinated his missionary work to other concerns. 92.29.32.165 (talk) 09:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Livingstone's education

The Wikipedia article does not mention that David Livingstone was taught Latin by an Irish Catholic priest, Fr. Daniel Gallagher, Parish Priest of St. Simon's church in Partick, Glasgow. This helped him gain admission to the college to study medicine. This event is commemorated in a mural on the interior wall of the hall attached to the back of St. Simon's Church, Partick Bridge St., Partick, Glasgow. I am a parishioner there and it is a matter of pride to the parish. Liamwaldron (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there is a lot lost in the article by leaving out his missionary work. Granted I only heard the story for the first time during a podcast I was listening to today. I thought it was an inspiring journey until I read this article. Very bland, almost cruel in its portrayal. But I would imagine on the flip side, if we did include more on his missionary work the secularists would have a heart attack and cry foul, or worse, start a rediculous criticsm revert war like they've done on the Dave Ramsey page. Wikipedia, being multi-culteral, we have to accomodate everybody. It does raise questions though. You would think there would be a way of relating "what the subject believed or believes" without having a dozen editors who happen to disagree with the subjects principals go out of their way to include their counter-argument. (because its always a controversy, and you gotta show *both sides*)--Arkcana 07:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. That could not be farther from the truth. Unless, that is, what you mean by 'include more on his missionary work' you mean expanses of doctrine that reads more like a Sunday sermon than an encyclopedia piece? If that were the case, then yes, we would, but not because of 'secularism' - but for the same reasons that we would not allow an article about a software company that offers 'solutions' to contain expanses of marketing gobbledygook (many of which such articles have been gutted and likely many more still need to be), nor editorials about how and why sliced bread was revolutionary because it liberated middle class housewives from the drab bondage chains that having to slice bread herself is. In short: none of such are material that belong in an encyclopaedia. Firejuggler86 (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The end of Charles Livingstone

Can someone fix this sentence: "The other Europeans, including Livingstone's brother Charles (the one exception -- George Rae, an engineer) either died, resigned, or were fired by Livingstone." The parenthetical is ugly, but more importantly it's unclear as to whether Charles died, resigned or was fired. Presumably died since this is most noteworthy, but we can't be sure. Curious (i.e. morbidly obsessed) readers are gonna want to know. I didn't find a credible answer in my first page of Google searches, so I'll leave it to our WP experts. --User:Chinasaur

Heart in Africa

Was his heart literally buried in Africa? [[User:Rhymeless|Rhymeless | (Methyl Remiss)]] 10:34, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

That's what I've always heard and a google search confirms Mydotnet 17:50, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)

Would it be ok to stick it back in with a less sentimental ending - 'the natives buried his heart in Africa' or something?Mydotnet 18:43, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

All his internal organs were removed (or the body would have rotted; practical not sentimental). I have a source here which claims they were eaten not buried though. Justinc 01:34, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. In the book: David Livingstone: Dernier Journal, 1999 Eds. Arléa ISBN 2-86959-449-6 this is discussed. To conserve his body for transport, his heart and other organs were taken out, put in an iron box and buried four feet deep close to the place where he died. The body was conserved by replacing his internal organs by salt and pouring 'eau-de-vie' in his mouth.... there is more to say on this part... Would you think this should be mentioned in the article? I could work it out. --User:AAM | Talk 13:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current story about his body being claimed by Britain right after his death appears like pure fantasy to me and should be removed in my opinion. Much more likely a tribal tradition, as I've seen mentioned, or as user AAM says, a practicality. JMK (talk) 07:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zambesi vs Zambezi

I suggest that, for the sake of consistensy, we use the spelling Zambezi (most used English spelling) instead of Zambesi. --Ezeu 19:32, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Illness

When did he lose contact with the "outside" world? It says six years, but six years prior to 1871 was 1865. This says he was in London and India in 1865. It also says that he was known to be alive in 1867 (letters and a search expedition). FireWorks 02:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chuma and Susi

These two loyal staff of David Livingstone i.e. Chuma and Susi appear in this article and many other writings on Dr Livingstone I have come across. Is it possible to shed more light-origin,ethnicity etc about them?

Comments made by 218.41.46.88

An anonymous user (218.41.46.88) recently put comments in the article, inappropriate but probably not intended as vandalism. The comments seemed valuable, you can see those edits in the revision difference here / Ezeu 08:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of personal insight

This article suffers from a lack of insight as to Dr. Livingstone's views, other than "Christianity, Commerce and Civilization." It would be nice to see a bit more detail here (I will research this if I have time). It seems like he existed at a pivotal time (the African colonization / exploitation rush) but with a seemingly more altruistic motive than, say, Cecil Rhodes.

Cause of death

Why is bowel obstruction mentioned as one of the causes of his death? Are there reliable sources for that? In his last journal he mentions he suffers from attacks of dysenteria, that this causes a lot of blood loss that was weakening him. He also writes on his malaria problem that he suppresses with quinine.--User:AAM | Talk 14:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed bowel obstruction into dysentery. I found no reference justifying bowel obstruction and see above: he writes himself that he has dysentery close to the end of his life. --User:AAM | Talk 21:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Livingstone, I presume?

Dr.Livingstone, I presume?- is a famous line that was spoken by Henry Morton Stanley, a fellow missionary of David Livingstone from Britain. This statement is said to have indirectly influence Imperial forces to occupy Africa and eventually promote slavery of native Africans.The mian target of slaves were the small civilized villages of western and central Africa.

Stanley wasn't a missionary, he was a reporter. It was the words of Livingstone which promoted the Scramble for Africa, the slave trade had been made illegal decades before. PhilipPage 22:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How did that statement apart from their meeting possibly influence the British decision to colonise? That seems thoroughly absurd to me, as does the article's introductory sentence, which apparently reduces the seriousness of the article's subject. I would like to see that sentence changed; I know that I (who know very little about Livingstone) do not best remember Livingstone by that quote. A.G. Pinkwater 01:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a contradiction between the qualification of “I presume” as anachronistic in the introductin and the section titled Stanley meeting. (i) I doubt anachronistic is the proper word — maybe apocryphal; (ii) under Stanley meeting the phrase “I presume” is considered perfectly plausible even if not confirmed. The qualifications of anachronistic or apocryphal give a false (negative) certitude about a phrase quite likely to have actually been said. --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 10:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronistic is most definitely not correct. I think you are likely correct that apocryphal was what was meant. I shall change it, if i see that still in the article text. Firejuggler86 (talk) 12:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This page has been badly vandalised. Can someone please fix it? I don't know how to flag things.

Fixed, reverted to the version of Frito. --User:AAM | Talk 19:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

life of livingstone

david is a very interesting man.i like that about him!

Livingstone and the slave trade

I feel the article is crying out for a section with this heading. All Livingstone biographies deal with his anti-slave trade stance which was influential in Britain and the US, yet there's no mention of it. There is a mention of him accepting help from slave traders in one sentence (which shouldn't be in the illness section because he accepted help in 1867-8 before he fell ill). It's potentially controversial. So I have added a heading and section on slavery and moved the 'accepting help' part there, with names dates and references.Rexparry sydney 02:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frequent vandalism -- time to protect page?

Page has been vandalised a dozen times in the last month, so it might be time to ask for it it to be protected. Rexparry sydney 21:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As of April 2007 this has declined and seems manageable. Rexparry sydney 00:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updating page

Not sure about Wiki etiquette, but I'd say the references to Livingstone's education need updated... The Squirrel Anatomy is obviously a joke and most folk will spot it but it was Anderson College he studied at, not Glasgow University - as can be read in Tim Jeal's 1973 biography...Kennethshand 17:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have authoritative sources and you see obvious errors, the etiquette is just to be bold and fix it. The article is a good one from the point of view of showing the way references are done. This is a good introduction to nuts and bolts of editing the page. Don't forget the edit summary to let people know what you're doing. Happy editing --Stephen Burnett 17:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also page references Livingstone's wife twice, once dying of malaria, and once of an alcohol related illness???

Canadian Context

It's great that Wikipedia would include various honours named after David Livingstone from around the world, as well as various pop-culture references, but I wanted to add one more in the Canadian context-- that of the Livingstone range of the Rocky Mountains, in southern Alberta.

Thanks very much,

David MacKenzie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.89.250.75 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four years later, done. The Interior (Talk) 01:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Luc Picard's fish

It says "he fish seen in the background of Captain Picard's ready room in the popular television series "Star Trek The Next Generation" is named Livingston after the famous explorer." Does it really have a different spelling to the man? Salopian (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisms

I don't really know why this article is under siege of some stupid jokers. I was shocked to discover that Livingstone was Gary Coleman crusader and his gayness as an explorer was (...). Maybe it will be good idea to protect this article somehow. Also, there are some errors which I don't know how to fix. Can somebody deal with them? Einfall (talk) 08:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's OK now. Thanks for helping to clean up vandalism. Korg (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've never edited this site before, but i know that david livingstone was not killed by black entertainment television. i just dont want to ruin anything by changing it, can someone remove this, or is this talk page long forgotten?i really hope im not abusing the request for comment function, but this website is enormously complex and it took me an hour just to find that, hopefully the issue is resolved.Gannon 34 (talk) 04:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! And thank you for drawing attention to this vandalism. It's been corrected now. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"After the Kolobeng mission had to be 2m is cool and jonny is cool red the African interior to the north, in the period 1852–56," Does anyone else see something slightly wrong with this?50.8.86.129 (talk) 09:14, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reporting this vandalism. It has now been fixed. -- Donald Albury 12:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New images from the London Missionary Society

Around 1900 the London Missionary Society produced a series of magic lantern slides depicting the efforts of Livingstone, and as pseudonymous UK works these are now public domain. They're all high resolution, although they generally need cropping for in-article use.

Feel free to use any that you find relevant and useful. Dcoetzee 23:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Letter recently deciphered

Please see:

David Livingstone letter deciphered at last

Other sources should be available and considered for inclusion. ----moreno oso (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected link. Farawayman (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this would be a fascinating addition.--Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 16:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of death?

I read that the actual cause of death was his voluntary consumption (at the end when he was very sick) of calomel, a mercury compound. Is that true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.148.113 (talk) 00:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Song: What About Livingstone

The song 'What About Livingstone' was written and performed by ABBA, not as otherwise stated in this article; 'Peter Blake' was an English artist, not a Swedish pop performer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.178.99 (talk) 00:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have boldly removed the whole trivia section. If we are to include all the utterances of "Dr. X, I presume" in popular culture, another article will be needed. If anyone feels strongly about any of those entries, let's find a reliable source that asserts significance. The Interior (Talk) 01:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of Dr. Stanley's encounter with Livingstone

So this website: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1871stanley.asp is very reputable, and has a different and what appears to be a more accurate transcript of the conversation between the two men. The quotation in the article should probably be replaced with this one. Correct me if I'm wrong. Mike44456 (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lacuna in biography?

The section Exploration of southern and central Africa begins with: "After the Kolobeng mission had to be closed because of drought, he explored the African interior to the north...". How he wound up at the mission, or even a simple explanation of what the mission was all about, is never given. ~ Alcmaeonid (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archives section errors

The "archives" section states that Livingstone's papers are in the University of Glasgow Archives, however, searching their online catalog I can find no evidence of this.

Livingstoneonline, which is a scholarly website that has collocated digitized versions of his papers, has a list of locations of his papers here which include: National Archives of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Livingstone Museum, Livingstone, Zambia Brenthurst Library, Johannesburg School of Oriental and African Studies, London. Royal Geographical Society The British Library, London Rhodes House Library, Bodleian Library, Oxford David Livingstone Centre at Blantyre And add that "However, the most significant custodian of Livingstone's manuscripts is the National Library of Scotland."

Sorry, I'm not a Wikipedian (I'm a librarian) otherwise I'd try to fix this myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article

thanks for an informative article. I actually found it somewhat amusing, e.g. Livingstone reported by one of his companions as being "out of his mind" etc. I've got to say Livingstone certainly showed perseverance. If you don't admire him for anything else, you've got to admire the guy's doggedness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Livingston's cichlid, Nimbochromis livingstonii

I've verified that the above animal's common name is indeed "Livingston's cichlid" -- which led me, in turn, to wonder if it was actually named after Livingstone, whose name, obviously, is spelled differently. The only reference I could find was a blog that may well have copied it from this article. It's a small point, but if anyone has a reliable source verifying that it was in fact named after Livingstone -- and if so, why his name was misspelled, and never corrected -- it would put this minor issue to bed and supply an additional source for the article. DoctorJoeE ^{review transgressions}/_{talk to me!} 17:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:David Livingstone/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs more reference citations, and article could be expanded as well. Badbilltucker 23:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 12:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

How did they get Livingstone's body back to the UK?

His body would have started to decompose very quickly. Any container he was put into would have leaked and the smell would of course, become overpowering. So they must have done something with the body prior to taking it on the long journey back home. Did they just take his bones? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.145.103 (talk) 02:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Witnesses say they removed the internal organs and buried them, salted the body and let it dry, then wrapped the corpse in the bark of a tree and finally in sail cloth. Like how beef jerky preserves meat. They told anyone who asked it was a bolt of cloth. When it got back to England they were only able to identify him by the broken arm bone. -- GreenC 17:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on David Livingstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Livingstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080217151257/http://www.livingstoneonline.ucl.ac.uk/index.html to http://www.livingstoneonline.ucl.ac.uk/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Livingstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date of first photography 1864

Please name that thing correctly. --62.202.188.221 (talk) 12:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spreading the gospel

The phrase "Spreading the gospel" is in standard usage beyond religion. For example these scholarly publications: 1) Spreading the gospel of the modern dance: newspaper dance criticism in the United States, 1850-1934 (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997). 2) "Making the desert blossom: spreading the gospel of irrigation" Journal of the Southwest 2014; 3) " Spreading the gospel: the mission of insolvency, and insolvency practitioners, in the early 21st century" Journal of business law, 2014; 4) "Suicide prevention: spreading the gospel to general practitioners" British Journal of Psychiatry, 1992; (5) "Spreading the Gospel of Hoops: How Television Helped Make Atlantic Coast Conference Basketball a Cultural Fixture in the South" The Southern Quarterly 2019. Rjensen (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

His death reported in 1867

Harper's Weekly reported, in its Mar/23/1867 edition (page 181), that Livingstone had been murdered by "Caffre savages in South Africa." A biography was printed on the same page, including a drawing of Livingstone.

Obviously this report was a mistake. But a paragraph about this episode might be warranted in this wikipedia page. How long was it before he was discovered to be alive? 2601:98A:4100:1620:5839:EA8C:AE7F:4288 (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]