Talk:Ben Johnson (Canadian sprinter)

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 24, 2005, September 24, 2006, September 24, 2007, and September 24, 2008.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Caribbean: Jamaica Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Jamaica portal This article is supported by WikiProject Jamaica (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Sport Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Olympics High‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics High‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

ban

ban him —This unsigned comment was added by 194.83.233.3 (talk • contribs) .

Quite. When was his world record surpassed by (presumably) non-steroidal means? -Ashley Pomeroy 10:57, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

its incredibly naive to think the gold medalists in these events are drug free. not testing positive does not equate to being drug free. the article is excellent, renders my copy of speed trap useless (almost ;)). StrengthCoach 23:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, sorry but I don't think it's a very good article. It's an excellent story which would be perfect for a magazine or something, but using all this emotive language and summarizing a book doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. It's also too long and while interesting, an encyclopedia should just list the facts and cut all the action. 218.102.71.167 10:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to try and do better. Yankees76 22:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a track fan and this is a very informative and interesting article. Well done. An encyclopedia entry doesn't have to be boring. Missaeagle —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missaeagle (talk • contribs) 19:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I'm working on putting together sources for each quote/fact. Much of it is from Speed Trap, Inside Track and the CBC. This was the first article I wrote for Wikipedia, and I missed that aspect. If anyone can help, please feel free to add sources. Thanks. Yankees76 14:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

I see a contradiction: "Gold" should read "bronze", otherwise it doesn't make sense in this passage: "In May 1987, Lewis’s father died of cancer and it was at the funeral that Lewis pulled from his pocket his gold medal from the Los Angeles 100 metres and put it in his father’s hands. “I want you to have this”, he said, “because it was your favorite event”. When his mother expressed her surprise, he said calmly: “Don’t worry, I’ll get another one”. 29 July 2006

I'm not following you. Carl Lewis won numerous gold medals at the LA games. Ben Johnson won the bronze. The paragraph is about Lewis - not Johnson. And please sign your posts as well. Thanks. Yankees76 05:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and sensationalism

Wow, this is an extremely dramatized and sensationalistic article. Sources are badly needed here. An example is:

It was in a quiet meeting with Francis, in Toronto in September 1981, three months before his 20th birthday that Francis brought up the subject of steroids. He informed Johnson that steroids represented 1% of performance, or the equivalent of one metre in the 100 metres, and he suggested that it was time to put Johnson in touch with his doctor. And it was a few days later that Johnson phoned Francis. He had made up his mind, and yes, he wanted that extra metre.

How can we so baldly assert the facts of what was a private meeting of two people? Was this Francis' story, as would make sense since the article quotes from his book later? This should be stated.

Was Johnson panicked by all this into a late run to the drugs cabinet? Not according to Francis.

The tone here is hardly encyclopaedic.

In the finals, however, Ben stepped it up a notch, destroying the world record with a time of 9.83 seconds. He finished almost exactly a metre ahead of Lewis, exactly the lead that Francis once told him the steroids could provide.

The dramatic value here -- the difference equalling exactly what was promised with steroids -- seems so perfect as to cast the original account of Francis/Johnson's meeting into doubt. --Saforrest 17:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That quote/fact was obtained here: [[1]]Yankees76 13:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Saforrest. I just tried to clean up the first section. I think we could do with less melodrama and fewer sub plots. David D. (Talk) 17:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fully concur. This article is smutty and written to excite and please vulgar taste. It's not written like an encyclopedia but like a tawdry British tabloid newspaper. Loginnigol (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

Just out of interest, what is to stop me deleting this whole article? I just googled one of the sentences from the article and came back with this article from The Times. Clearly there is major plagarism in this article. It might be best to delete the whole thing and start again from scratch. Here is another example. Many of the sentences are identical. It looks like this whole article is a cut and paste job from multiple sources. David D. (Talk) 19:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's just too hard to pick through and delete the plagarism sentence by sentence so i have deleted everything back to the source of the problem with this and subsequent edits. Sorry but it has to be this way. If I have deleted original work then please reinstate it. David D. (Talk) 20:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with David D. on this. It is a shame, as much of the plagiarized information was interesting and well written. We should leave a link on the article's page to those sources for those who want more information. Uucp 20:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Censoring Quotes

It's purest idiocy to use censorship on quotes! "Don't tell me I cheated the system because that's [expletive]". That should be changed immeadiatly! In other respects the article is somewhat sentimental, but that's minor. Those who care enough, just change the stylistic solutions to create for a more neutral tone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.221.16.164 (talk • contribs)

It seems like you care enough. The advantage of wikipedia is that you can actually make these changes yourself. Everyone is allowed to edit the articles. David D. (Talk) 17:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you propose we change it to? The editor above doesn't seem to have read the Boston Globe article that the quote is pulled from. The quote is word for word from that article, [expletive] included. There is no need to make any changes.[2]Yankees76 17:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly right. Changes should not be made with out research. David D. (Talk) 18:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right. The reason I didn't change it myself is that I could't find out what it is that Johnson really said. The point was that it would be better to actually quote Johnson and not some Boston Globe reporter who apparently has got some journalistic practices very wrong. If the interviewee says something unquotable you don't quote him and censor the inappropriate parts. It would be hilarious in some other context, but here its just stupid because its so wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.221.16.164 (talk • contribs)

Okay well then I will leave it up to you to contact the Boston Globe and ask them to reprint the article uncensored or at least publish a transcript of the interview so that we may then find out what word was censored and make the correction. Let me know how that goes. Yankees76 04:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cynics?

"This was the start of Lewis’ calling on the sport of track and field to be cleaned up in terms of the illegal use of performance-enhancing drugs. While cynics noted that the problem had been in the sport for many years" It doesn't make a person a cynic! That's ridiculous!

False Claim

There was a claim that Carl Lewis tested positive and a citation to this article: http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2006/12/05/johnson-lewis-conspiracy.html which says no such thing. I have removed the false claim. (Of course someone could act a valid citation).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.220.98 (talk) 01:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though this CBC article does say exactly that - presumably there is another earlier CBC article which also says this - perhaps whoever added this reference had quoted the wrong article. Nfitz (talk) 08:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Scandal: Not Accurate

In the following link, Ben Jhonson said that the drug was a conspiracy and was sneaked into his food.

http://www.cbc.ca/olympics/athletics/story/2008/05/16/f-olympics-athletics-benjohnson.html [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolsafe (talk • contribs) 00:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic scandal/POV

I have added the POV-section tag. The discussion of the other (true or alleged) PED users is factually disputable and lacking in neutrality. There is, for instance, no proof of deliberate and non-trivial PED use in the case of Carl Lewis---a positive test notwithstanding. "Of these, only Johnson was forced to give up his records and his medals.", again, misses the point: Johnson was the only one to be tested as positive in the relevant championship (with some minor reservation for Christie), and everything went according to the rule-book. Christie's one clear-cut cheat occured some ten years later, e.g. Other similar examples exist. 94.220.247.12 (talk) 17:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christie failed two drug tests during his career. He tested positive for a banned stimulant at the 1988 Olympics but was cleared 11 votes to 10 votes by a panel after claiming to have ingested it in a cup of ginseng tea. Then he was banned for two years by the IAAF in 1999 after testing positive for nandrolone.

Nonetheless I have cleaned up the section to remove some of the obvious POV and attribute certain claims to invididuals, not to Wikipedia.--Yankees76 (talk) 22:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect Failure?

Is it just me or is there something about this story that comes across as a perfect failure?TonyMath (talk) 20:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ben Johnson (sprinter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070426093630/http://outside.away.com:80/outside/magazine/1298/9812ben.html to http://outside.away.com/outside/magazine/1298/9812ben.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ben Johnson (sprinter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216225449/http://www.brandchannel.com:80/features_profile.asp?pr_id=306 to http://www.brandchannel.com/features_profile.asp?pr_id=306

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ben Johnson (sprinter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150523080648/http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/jo/ben-johnson-1.html to http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/jo/ben-johnson-1.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brandchannel.com/features_profile.asp?pr_id=306
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gg.ca/honours/search-recherche/honours-desc.asp?lang=e&TypeID=orc&id=841

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved by Danski454 who perhaps forgot to close the discussion :) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Johnson (sprinter) → Ben Johnson (Canadian sprinter) – To avoid confusion with Ben Johnson (American sprinter), who is notable in his own right. Though this Ben Johnson was born in Jamaica, he represented Canada, so he should be disambiguated as a Canadian. ONR (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support partial disambiguation is a bad idea. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and Crouch, Swale. Main title headers for all incomplete disambiguations, such as this one, should be revised. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:26, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support WP:INCDAB In ictu oculi (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.