This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Ozymandias was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Ozymandias was copied or moved into Ozymandias (Smith) with this edit on 7 February 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Yes, I apologize for making a comparison which I now realize is irrelevant and misrepresents the suggestion. However, if I look up Ozymandias in a dictionary the first words are "a well-known poem", i.e. the word Ozymandias alone brings me to the entry for the poem, I still oppose. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose:WikiNav shows that the vast majority of readers arriving at this page are ending up where they want to, with a mere handful leaving to Ramesses II. The poem is the fairly obvious WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and nothing here demurs. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - This article's subject is overwhelmingly the primary topic for this title. Yes, Ozymandias is the Greek version of the name of Rhamsses III and is older than the 19th century, however two points are made at WP:DPT, that While long-term significance is a factor, historical age is not determinative. and Being the original source of the name is also not determinative. With that in mind the guideline at Wikipedia:Disambiguation does not support the rationale given for the move. - Aoidh (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support no clear primary topic by either criteria, the poem has 55,570 views but Breaking Bad has 48,974, Watchmen has 8,082 and Ramesses II has 72,700[[1]]. Move the DAB to the base name though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but that's the disambiguation page, which is what many people arrive at having expressly clicked away from the poem in search of related subjects, or having arrived from the minority of links that are not already disambiguated. But in the same time period, this Ozymandias garnered over five million page views. Breaking Bad and Watchman both reference the poem. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Total page views are never a useful metric for determining a name's primacy when it's such an apples to oranges comparison in all regards. Ramseses II having more views doesn't mean anything regarding the specific name Ozymandias because are they searching that article hoping to arrive at this title? Absolutely not, the title of Ozymandias is an insignificant factor of what people are looking for when they arrive at that article. While the Breaking Bad episode has views, it's also a GA and GAs get spikes in views on that merit alone which inflates the view count. Looking at views over time the daily average looks similar at first, but when you remove the absurdly large spike on May 15 skewing the average so dramatically, the daily views are about half of what this article gets. Not to mention, this article has long-term significance regarding this name (meeting WP:PT2), whereas the episode does not. This is the clear primary topic for this title. - Aoidh (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ramesses II is his real name; the outdated Ancient Greek name is not primary over the poem or even competing for a potential primary topic. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Although most sources agree with the pronunciation of "Ozymandias" given in the article, I note that the London-born, Oxford-educated writer, Simon Winchester, O.B.E., speaking on YouTube's The Michael Shermer Show (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfOy6puBm6U; first instance at 34:22, second at 34:42) twice pronounced it approximately as "ah-zee-man-DYE-əs" with the accent clearly on the penult and not on the antepenult. Whether this is an idiosyncratic pronunciation of his or else reflective of a lesser-known but acceptable alternative pronunciation, I can't say; although the stress he used on the podcast would affect the poem's scansion, it does at least follow the stress in the classical Greek rendition of the pharaonic name (Ὀσυμανδύας) and echoes a similar disparity in stress that occurs in the English pronunciation of the name of the Achaemenid king Darius. 108.4.145.11 (talk) 00:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale._01.svg){kind=small}
