Jump to content

User:Knucmo2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My current wikimood.

Therapy?

[edit]

As regards addiction to this encyclopedia, I seem to be safe, since I scored 91 (PHEW!!) on the "test".

  • Too many Userboxes suck.

Wikipedia Work

[edit]
  • As a note, the reason for this page is to keep track of the articles I've edited all in one place without having to trawl through my contributions page. It is not, as might be thought to the visitors of other Wikipedian's pages, merely self-congratulatory, though of course, I cannot speak for my fellow editors entirely. --Knucmo2 17:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Pages I have created

[edit]

Pages I have edited

[edit]

(severely out of date)

Templates I have created/edited

[edit]

Projects

[edit]
  • My main project on here to compile encyclopedic articles on philosophical and musical knowledge.

Things you can do

[edit]

  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.

Other matters

[edit]
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
fr-2Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.
This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.
LGThis user's alignment is Lawful Good: the "Crusader."
This user is a member of Wikipedians against censorship.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Military history.
This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years.
This user is a WikiWizard.

Saving the universe, one article at a time.

It's magic.
This editor is a Grognard Extraordinaire and is entitled to display this Wikipedia Vest Pocket Edition.
All rights released to all minor edits
I agree to release all rights, unless otherwise stated, to all my English Wikipedia text contributions marked as minor edits, enabling anyone to use them for any purpose. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to freely use my minor edit contributions, please check the multi-licensing guide.