Talk:Los Angeles Times

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Los Angeles Times article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

California: Los Angeles Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Los Angeles Times in the 21st century was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 August 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Los Angeles Times. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/los-angeles-times-harris-endorsement-b2634583.html

Los Angeles Times apologizes for history of racism

An interesting article that I think has several elements that could be integrated into the article in an WP:ABOUTSELF manner here: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-09-27/los-angeles-times-apology-racism --2600:6C51:447F:D8D9:38F2:C611:118:641D (talk) 11:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody can edit (or add to) this article. You can do it yourself, and if you need help, somebody will step up to assist you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Intercept: A Los Angeles Times intelligence reporter routinely submitted story drafts to the CIA for review

https://theintercept.com/2014/09/04/former-l-times-reporter-cleared-stories-cia-publication/

Not sure where this should be included

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe under "Other controversies"? Be sure to have more than one source, including a response from the L.A. Times. Best wishes, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]