Talk:Succession to Muhammad
Succession to Muhammad has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 5, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Succession to Muhammad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
New edits
[edit]Collected the bibliography at the end of the article, added perhaps a dozen new reliable sources, copy-edited the article to improve neutrality and clarity. These edits are too many to summarize here but, I think, it's very clear that the revised article is better-sourced and less biased. I don't think any of the edits are controversial but, if there are any concerns, please discuss them here first. Albertatiran (talk) 19:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Oke
[edit]@Hut pagle 119.155.185.40 (talk) 13:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Socialogy
[edit]Fit to by my HS 119.155.185.40 (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Its ok 119.155.185.40 (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]I propose merging Islamic leadership into Succession to Muhammad. I think the first article entirely duplicates the intentions of this one—sans references—and the links to it would appropriately arrive here, none of them seem to be about leadership generally. What do others think? — penultimate_supper 🚀 talk 11:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There is nothing to merge. The other article has no sources and should be deleted instead. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, that’s basically what I think, but since both have coexisted for so long I didn’t want to act without consultation penultimate_supper 🚀 talk 12:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, so we're all in agreeance that Islamic Leadership should just be deleted? Is there any one else to ask or are we just good to go ahead? Halima Buhari (talk) 09:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Since it seemed there was consensus, I carried out the redirect. Probably didn't need to ask in the first place, but boldness has never been one of my primary strengths. —penultimate_supper 🚀 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, so we're all in agreeance that Islamic Leadership should just be deleted? Is there any one else to ask or are we just good to go ahead? Halima Buhari (talk) 09:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, that’s basically what I think, but since both have coexisted for so long I didn’t want to act without consultation penultimate_supper 🚀 talk 12:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- GA-Class Middle Ages articles
- Mid-importance Middle Ages articles
- GA-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- GA-Class Islam-related articles
- Top-importance Islam-related articles
- GA-Class Muslim history articles
- Top-importance Muslim history articles
- Muslim history task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- GA-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles